Calculating Work Along a Path with a Force Proportional to Distance Cubed

compliant
Messages
43
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A particle is attracted towards the origin by a force proportional to the cube of its distance from the origin. How much work is done in moving the particle from the origin to the point (2,4) along the path y = x^2 assuming a coefficient of friction \mu between the particle and the path?

The Attempt at a Solution



For the path, set x = t. Thus, y = t^2

\vec{r}(t) = t\hat{i} + t^2\hat{j}
\vec{r}'(t) = \hat{i} + 2t\hat{j}

Because we're going from the origin to (2,4), t goes from 0 to 2.

For the force, we know that:

\left\|F\right\| = {k(x^2 + y^2)}^{3/2}

I want this ideally in vector form, but the best I could come up with:
{\left\|F\right\|}^{1/3} = kx\hat{i} + ky\hat{j}

My main problem is I can't really use {\left\|F\right\|}^{1/3} to calculate \int_{C} {F\cdot dr}. If I could just find a way to express F in vector form, I'm pretty much off to the races. (Because I can then calculate the work done by friction by finding the normal to \vec{r}(t), multiplying it by \mu, and dotting it with \vec{r}'(t) from 0\leq t \leq 2, etc. etc.)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The vector (x*i+y*j)/sqrt(x^2+y^2) points away from the origin in the direction of (x,y) and has length 1. Just take that vector and adjust it's length and direction.
 
How would I adjust for the "cube of the distance" though ? Looking at the numerator of that unit vector, there isn't much, I think, that one can do with (x\hat{i} + y\hat{j})^3
 
The cube of the distance is r^3=(x^2+y^2)^(3/2), like you said. If u=(x*i+y*j)/sqrt(x^2+y^2) has length 1, shouldn't r^3*u have length proportional to r^3? What does that vector simplify to? (x*i+y*j)^3 doesn't even mean anything.
 
Last edited:
(facepalm of realization)

I'd probably multiply r^3 and u together, wouldn't I.

Then slap on the k at the front of the product, and equate it to F.
 
compliant said:
(facepalm of realization)

I'd probably multiply r^3 and u together, wouldn't I.

Then slap on the k at the front of the product, and equate it to F.

Sure, where k is going to be negative if you want it to point towards the origin.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top