Calculating Work and Kinetic Energy in a Two Mass Pulley System

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a two mass pulley system where the original poster seeks to calculate the work done by gravitational forces and the kinetic energy of the masses involved. The problem involves concepts from mechanics, specifically work, energy, and motion in the presence of friction.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to relate work done to changes in potential and kinetic energy, questioning how to express these relationships accurately.
  • Some participants suggest specific formulas for work and acceleration, while others question the assumptions regarding the work done by gravity on both masses.
  • There is discussion about the effects of friction and how it alters the calculations for acceleration and velocity.
  • Participants express uncertainty about the implications of their calculations on the kinetic energy distribution between the masses.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, providing insights and corrections to each other's reasoning. Some guidance has been offered regarding the correct application of work and energy principles, but there remains a lack of consensus on certain aspects, particularly regarding the distribution of kinetic energy and the role of friction.

Contextual Notes

There are constraints related to the assumptions made about friction and the mass of the pulley and rope, which are noted but not resolved. The original poster's attempts indicate a need for clarification on the fundamental principles involved.

Diego Cunha
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



https://int.erlace.com/uploads/teacher/1533/images/3modifiedatwood(1).jpg
Ignore friction and the the rope and the pulley and the rope have negligible mass.
  1. When the hanging block
    gif.latex?M_2.gif
    has descended a distance
    gif.latex?%5CDelta%20h.gif
    , how much work has the gravitational force by the Earth done on the system?
  2. That work went into the kinetic energy of the masses. What fraction of that kinetic energy went into the motion of the hanging block?
  3. Suppose now there's a coefficient of kinetic friction
    gif.latex?%5Cmu_k.gif
    between
    gif.latex?M_1.gif
    and the table surface. Find the speed of the masses when
    gif.latex?M_2.gif
    has descended that distance
    gif.latex?%5CDelta%20h.gif
    .

Homework Equations



gif.latex?W%3D-%5CDelta%20U.gif

gif.latex?KE%3D%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B2%7Dmv%5E2.gif

gif.latex?U_%7Bg%7D%3Dmgh.gif


The Attempt at a Solution



1. I figured the work done was equal to change in potential energy, so

gif.latex?W%3Dmg%5CDelta%20h.gif
gif.latex?%3D%28m_%7B2%7D+m_%7B1%7D%29gh.gif


2. I'm not sure how to go about this one. I tried to take what I found for the work done and relate it the kinetic energy of the masses, so something like
7B1%7D%29gh%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B2%7Dm_%7B2%7Dv%5E2+%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B2%7Dm_%7B1%7Dv%5E2.gif
, but I don't know if this would help, or if it is right at all.

3. Not sure. I derived an expression for acceleration of the system, and again I don't know if it would help.

gif.latex?a%3D%5Cfrac%7Bm_%7B2%7Dg-%5Cmu%20m_%7B1%7Dg%7D%7Bm_%7B2%7D+m_%7B1%7D%7D.gif


Thanks.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Looks like two pictures didn't post

For part 1, (m1 + m2)gh

For part 3, a = (m2g - μm1g)/(m1 + m2)
 
Your solution :

(1.) is wrong .
Does gravity do work on both blocks ?

*Remember - Work done is ∫F.dx

(2.) - What is acceleration of each block ? So what is velocity after moving a distance Δh ?

(3.) - Repeat as previous part .

I hope this helps .
 
Diego Cunha said:
For part 3, a = (m2g - μm1g)/(m1 + m2)
You got that part right.
 
Qwertywerty said:
Your solution :

(1.) is wrong .
Does gravity do work on both blocks ?

*Remember - Work done is ∫F.dx

(2.) - What is acceleration of each block ? So what is velocity after moving a distance Δh ?

(3.) - Repeat as previous part .

I hope this helps .

Yes, this helps. Gravity would only do work on m2 so the work done would be equal to m2gh. The acceleration of the blocks are the same, so each would have an an acceleration a = (m2g)/(m1+m2 ), without friction. For the m2, the velocity would be (m2v2)/2 = m2gh, so v = √(2gh). Does this tell me anything in terms of how much kinetic energy went into moving m2, would it be all of it?
 
Diego Cunha said:
Yes, this helps. Gravity would only do work on m2 so the work done would be equal to m2gh. The acceleration of the blocks are the same, so each would have an an acceleration a = (m2g)/(m1+m2 ), without friction. For the m2, the velocity would be (m2v2)/2 = m2gh, so v = √(2gh). Does this tell me anything in terms of how much kinetic energy went into moving m2, would it be all of it?

I think my expression for velocity was wrong, since I didn't account for m1, it would be v=√2h(m2g)/(m1+m2 )
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
7K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
24
Views
4K
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K