Calculating Work and Kinetic Energy in a Two Mass Pulley System

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating work and kinetic energy in a two-mass pulley system, specifically addressing the work done by gravitational force on the hanging block and its relationship to kinetic energy. Initially, it was suggested that the work done equates to the change in potential energy, but it was clarified that gravity only does work on the hanging mass, m2, resulting in work equal to m2gh. The acceleration of both blocks is the same, calculated as a = (m2g)/(m1 + m2) when ignoring friction. The correct expression for velocity after descending a distance is v = √(2h(m2g)/(m1 + m2)). The discussion emphasizes the importance of accurately accounting for both masses in calculations of kinetic energy and velocity.
Diego Cunha
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



https://int.erlace.com/uploads/teacher/1533/images/3modifiedatwood(1).jpg
Ignore friction and the the rope and the pulley and the rope have negligible mass.
  1. When the hanging block
    gif.latex?M_2.gif
    has descended a distance
    gif.latex?%5CDelta%20h.gif
    , how much work has the gravitational force by the Earth done on the system?
  2. That work went into the kinetic energy of the masses. What fraction of that kinetic energy went into the motion of the hanging block?
  3. Suppose now there's a coefficient of kinetic friction
    gif.latex?%5Cmu_k.gif
    between
    gif.latex?M_1.gif
    and the table surface. Find the speed of the masses when
    gif.latex?M_2.gif
    has descended that distance
    gif.latex?%5CDelta%20h.gif
    .

Homework Equations



gif.latex?W%3D-%5CDelta%20U.gif

gif.latex?KE%3D%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B2%7Dmv%5E2.gif

gif.latex?U_%7Bg%7D%3Dmgh.gif


The Attempt at a Solution



1. I figured the work done was equal to change in potential energy, so

gif.latex?W%3Dmg%5CDelta%20h.gif
gif.latex?%3D%28m_%7B2%7D+m_%7B1%7D%29gh.gif


2. I'm not sure how to go about this one. I tried to take what I found for the work done and relate it the kinetic energy of the masses, so something like
7B1%7D%29gh%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B2%7Dm_%7B2%7Dv%5E2+%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B2%7Dm_%7B1%7Dv%5E2.gif
, but I don't know if this would help, or if it is right at all.

3. Not sure. I derived an expression for acceleration of the system, and again I don't know if it would help.

gif.latex?a%3D%5Cfrac%7Bm_%7B2%7Dg-%5Cmu%20m_%7B1%7Dg%7D%7Bm_%7B2%7D+m_%7B1%7D%7D.gif


Thanks.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Looks like two pictures didn't post

For part 1, (m1 + m2)gh

For part 3, a = (m2g - μm1g)/(m1 + m2)
 
Your solution :

(1.) is wrong .
Does gravity do work on both blocks ?

*Remember - Work done is ∫F.dx

(2.) - What is acceleration of each block ? So what is velocity after moving a distance Δh ?

(3.) - Repeat as previous part .

I hope this helps .
 
Diego Cunha said:
For part 3, a = (m2g - μm1g)/(m1 + m2)
You got that part right.
 
Qwertywerty said:
Your solution :

(1.) is wrong .
Does gravity do work on both blocks ?

*Remember - Work done is ∫F.dx

(2.) - What is acceleration of each block ? So what is velocity after moving a distance Δh ?

(3.) - Repeat as previous part .

I hope this helps .

Yes, this helps. Gravity would only do work on m2 so the work done would be equal to m2gh. The acceleration of the blocks are the same, so each would have an an acceleration a = (m2g)/(m1+m2 ), without friction. For the m2, the velocity would be (m2v2)/2 = m2gh, so v = √(2gh). Does this tell me anything in terms of how much kinetic energy went into moving m2, would it be all of it?
 
Diego Cunha said:
Yes, this helps. Gravity would only do work on m2 so the work done would be equal to m2gh. The acceleration of the blocks are the same, so each would have an an acceleration a = (m2g)/(m1+m2 ), without friction. For the m2, the velocity would be (m2v2)/2 = m2gh, so v = √(2gh). Does this tell me anything in terms of how much kinetic energy went into moving m2, would it be all of it?

I think my expression for velocity was wrong, since I didn't account for m1, it would be v=√2h(m2g)/(m1+m2 )
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top