Calculating Work and Kinetic Energy of Jet-Powered Train

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the work done and kinetic energy of a jet-powered train from the 1950s, which has a mass of 2.5 x 10^4 kg and is propelled by a thrust of 5 x 10^5 N over 500 meters. Participants clarify that since the train starts from rest, the change in kinetic energy is indeed equal to the final kinetic energy. There is some confusion regarding the calculations for parts b and c, but it is confirmed that understanding the relationship between work and kinetic energy is crucial. The conversation highlights the importance of correctly interpreting the problem to avoid misunderstandings. Overall, the calculations are straightforward if the concepts are grasped properly.
DarkAnt
Messages
195
Reaction score
0
In the 1950s, an experimental train that had a mass of 2.5 x 10^4kg was powered across level track by a jet engine that produced a thrust of 5 x 10^5N for a distance of 500m.
a) find the work done on the train.
b) find the change in kinetic energy.
c) find the final kinetic energy of the train if it started from rest.
d) find the final speed of the train if there was no friction.

ok, part A was easy. part b and c confuse me. since the train started at rest, wouldn't the change in kinetic energy be equal to the final kinetic energy?

am i missing something very important here or am i just missunderstanding this problem?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Originally posted by DarkAnt
... since the train started at rest, wouldn't the change in kinetic energy be equal to the final kinetic energy?
Yes.
am i missing something very important here or am i just missunderstanding this problem?
That depends on whether you can answer the questions correctly or not. :smile: If the questions seem too easy... you're probably right.
 
thanks doc
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top