Calculating Work Done by Engine on Railway Wagon

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the work done by an engine pulling a railway wagon loaded with coal at a constant speed. The work done by the engine is not equal to the kinetic energy imparted to the coal because some kinetic energy is lost as heat during the inelastic collision between the coal and the wagon. The work-energy theorem applies only to rigid bodies of constant mass, while the scenario involves variable mass due to the coal being added. The relationship between work and the change in kinetic energy can be derived using Newton's second law, considering the constant speed of the wagon. Overall, energy conservation does not hold in this case due to the inelastic nature of the collision.
bon
Messages
547
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A railway wagon runs on frictionless rails and is pulled by an engine traveling at
10 ms−1 . The wagon is loaded at constant rate with 1000 kg of coal, dropped vertically
from rest for a time of 2 s. What is the work done by the engine to keep the wagon
moving at constant speed? Is the work done equal to the kinetic energy imparted to
the coal and, if not, explain why not.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Done the first part fine..Just unsure about the second part...I know the work-energy theorem..But am i right in thinking that the WD =/= KE imparted to coal as some KE of coal is lost as heat as it collides with the wagon on its descent?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can just compare the work done with the gain in KE of the coal and see if they're equal. You're right that mechanical energy is not conserved as the coal is brought up to speed--think of the wagon as inelastically colliding with the coal. (It's not the KE due the coal's falling that matters here; you can just assume that the coal is dropped into the wagon from a low height with small vertical speed.)
 
The work-energy theorem is valid only to a rigid body of constant mass.You have variable mass here. Newton's second law is valid in the form dp/dt =F. The momentum is mv, so
dp/dt= v dm/dt +m dv/dt.
v is constant, so F=v*dm/dt. Multiplying both sides with v, and integrating with respect to time you get the relation between work and the change of the KE in this case.

As Doc Al said, you can not expect energy conservation, as this is kind of inelastic collision.



ehild
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top