Calculating work done by friction

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the work done by friction when a spring is compressed and released, the distance used in the work formula W=Fs should only account for the distance traveled by the object after it surpasses the uncompressed spring position. The discussion highlights that if the surface under the spring is not frictionless, friction will affect the energy conversion. Initial velocity after release can be determined using conservation of energy principles, where the elastic potential energy (EPE) converts to kinetic energy (KE). The remaining energy after accounting for friction represents the work done by friction. Understanding these concepts is crucial for accurately solving related physics problems.
rleung3
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
Hi,

When you compress a spring and release it (allowing object to spring some distance), to compute the work done by friction, your s term in W=Fs would have to equal the distance that the spring is compressed + the additional distance traveled by the object once it leaves the spring, right?

That's what I alwasy thought, but in one of my problems, it uses an s value that equals ONLY the distance traveled by the object after it surpasses the point of the uncompressed spring.

Ryan
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Does it say the surface under the spring is frictionless?
 
No, it does not...
 
Do you know the initial velocity after the object is released? You could use conservation of energy to see how much EPE is converted to KE. Whats left over is the work taken out of the system by friction. Then you can add this to what you figure out later
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top