Calculating Work: Hammering a Nail with a 0.40kg Hammer at 5.0 m/s

  • Thread starter Thread starter reahsalr
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Forces Work
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the work done by a technician using a 0.40 kg hammer at a speed of 5.0 m/s to drive a nail into wood. The kinetic energy of the hammer before impact is determined to be 5 J, while the gravitational potential energy at a height of 0.75 m is calculated as 3 J. The work done by the technician is derived from the difference between the kinetic energy and gravitational potential energy, resulting in 2 J of work. The conversation clarifies that the hammer's kinetic energy includes contributions from both the technician's force and gravitational pull. Ultimately, the correct calculation of work is confirmed to be 2 J.
reahsalr
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A technician uses a hammer to force a nail into a wooden beam.
The hammer has a mass of 0.40kg.
It has a speed of 5.0 m/s just before it hits the nail.
After raising the hammer to a height of 0.75m, how much work does the technician do in hitting the nail with the hammer?


Homework Equations



I also had to work out two parts before hand -
1. The kinetic energy just before it hits the nail - which was 5J using [KE=0.5mv^2]
2. The GPE at a height of 0.75m - which was 3J using [GPE=mgh]

The Attempt at a Solution


I got this last part wrong however, I tried using the formula [W=Fs], so 0.75 * 4 = 3. And got it wrong.

Thanks in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The hammer got its kinetic energy both from the man and from the gravitational pull of Earth. The work of gravity is equal to the gravitational potential energy that you calculated as 3 J (using g=10 m/s^2) The man exerts some downward force to the hammer, so it will be faster when hitting the nail as it were if the man just dropped it to the nail.

So: KE (of the hammer) = 3 J + W (work of the man). You need to give W.

ehild
 
So 5-3 = 2, Answer 2J

Many thanks, I was confused about that
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top