Chemistry Calculating X: Element Fraction from Mole Number

AI Thread Summary
X represents the element fraction in a compound, while n denotes the mole number of an element, with their relationship dependent on the context. Mole numbers are typically expressed as whole numbers, as seen in compounds like Al2O3 or C2H4. It's important to distinguish between mass fractions and mole fractions, as they convey different information. An example involving a binary solution illustrates the relationship between Gibbs free energy and mole fractions, highlighting the chemical potential's dependence on these variables. The discussion concludes with a query about whether the differential relationship dn=dx holds true in this context.
asdf1
Messages
734
Reaction score
0
Does X=n? X is the element fraction in a compound, and n is the mole number of an element.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It may or may not depending on the basis.

The mole number is usually given as a 'whole number' or 'integer', e.g. Al2O3 or C2H4.

Mass fractions and mole fractions are different.

Please provide an example.
 
Ex. For a binary solution, there's a graph with the Gibbs free energy of componet A on the left y axis, Gibbs free energy of componet B on the right y axis, and with XB as the x axis.

See the bottom diagram on pg6 of http://addis.caltech.edu/research/gibbs.pdf#search=%22gibbs%20free%20energy%20in%20binary%20solution%22

the straight line that passes through point (4) and (5) also equals the chemical potential on intersecting the left and right y axes. Therefore, I'm wondering if dn=dx, because the definition for
chemical potential=(dG)/(dn)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Xi = mole fraction of i = Ni / ΣNi

x is written in terms of the mole fraction of one of the components,

and

If the (molar) gibbs free energy of pure A is gA, and that of pure B is gB, then the (molar) gibbs free energy for the combination of pure components is g (pure, combined) = gA•XA + gB•XB
 
thank you~
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
7K
Back
Top