Calculating % Yield of Ester in Chemistry Lab

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the % yield of ester in a chemistry lab when the reaction is allowed to reach equilibrium without product removal. Participants express confusion about how to determine yield in this scenario, questioning what the yield is relative to. It is suggested that the yield may be smaller if the reaction is stopped early compared to allowing it to equilibrate fully. Clarification is sought on the definitions and comparisons involved in calculating yield. The conversation highlights the complexities of yield calculations in chemical reactions.
kosterot
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
% yield ester

I'm having a problem with my chemistry lab report. the question is: What would the % yield of ester be if the reaction were simply allowed to equilibrate (i.e. no products are
removed)?
I think the the yield is going to smaller but i don't know why.
pls help
 
Physics news on Phys.org


If the reaction mixture is allowed to reach the equilibrium, are all reactants converted to final products?
 


relative to what?
 


Shayes said:
relative to what?

What relative to what? You have just won todays contest for the most cryptic post.
 


Borek said:
What relative to what? You have just won todays contest for the most cryptic post.

You think the yield will be smaller relative to what? Relative to Stopping the rxn early?
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
Back
Top