Calculation involving Parallel Plate Capacitor

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the charge on the outer surface of a parallel plate capacitor modeled after a living cell membrane. The membrane has a surface area of 5.0 mm², a thickness of 10 nm, and a dielectric constant of 5.0, with an internal potential of -60.0 mV. Initial calculations yielded a charge of approximately -1.33 x 10^-25 C, leading to a calculated number of monovalent ions on the surface. Participants clarify the relationship between voltage, charge, and capacitance, emphasizing the need for correct formulas involving the dielectric constant and the role of polar molecules in the dielectric material. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding capacitance in biological contexts.
popsune
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi, I've a problem with this question and I'm not sure if I've worked it out correctly.

This is the question:

The membrane that surrounds a certain type of living cell has a surface area of 5.0 mm2 and a thickness of 10 nm. Assume that the membrane behaves like a parallel plate capacitor and has a dielectric constant of 5.0. If the potential inside the membrane is -60.0 mV with respect to the outside how much charge resides on the outer surface? If the charge is due to monovalent ions, how many such ions are present on the outer surface?
Epsilon0 = 8.85 X 10-12 C2/(N.m2)
e = 1.6 X 10-19 C

This is my working:

V=Q/Ak(Epsilon0)d
-60X10^-3=Q/(5.0X10^-6)X5.0X(8.85X10^-12)X(10X10^-9)
Q=-1.3275X10^-25C

Charge of 1 electron=1.6X10^-19C
No of ions = 1.3275X10-25/1.6X10^-19=8.296X10^-7
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF, popsune. Keep in mind that C = epslon * A / d as an approximation that matches your homework problem, and that epsilon = epsilon0 * epsilonR
 
berkeman said:
Welcome to PF, popsune. Keep in mind that C = epslon * A / d as an approximation that matches your homework problem, and that epsilon = epsilon0 * epsilonR
Hi thanks for the reply. But can you elaborate on your explanation, cos I don't really get it.
 
What Berkeman is trying to say is that your expression for V is wrong .
V = Q/C right ?

Now for a parallel plate capacitor ,
C = \frac{\epsilon_0\epsilon_rA}{d}

So Q/C becomes ...
 
arunbg said:
What Berkeman is trying to say is that your expression for V is wrong .
V = Q/C right ?

Now for a parallel plate capacitor ,
C = \frac{\epsilon_0\epsilon_rA}{d}

So Q/C becomes ...

Thanks, but what is Epsilon R?
 
\epsilon_{r} is the relative permitivity of the dielectric medium between the plates. A dielectric material is one which contains polar molecules. The polarity of the molecules will be randomly orientate when no electric field is applied. However, when an electric field is applies the material becomes polarised (each polar molecule is arranged the same), this effect decreases the effective electric field. However, as the electric field strength in inversly proportional to the capacitance, the capacitance increases due to these dipole moments (magnitude of charge multiplied by the distance between them). This is only a brief outline but I'm sure google could reveal more.

~H
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top