Calculation of leptonic decay widths

  • Thread starter Thread starter luis_m
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Calculation Decay
luis_m
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Halzen & Martin, problem 2.25


Homework Equations



The ρ and ω wavefunctions are u\overline{u}-d\overline{d} and u\overline{u}+d\overline{d} except for a normalization factor.

The Attempt at a Solution



In this problem one has to evaluate the expectation value of the charge operator for each of the mesons listed using their quarks wavefunctions and then square them but I get the same value of that expectation value for both ρ and ω so their squares will never be in the ratio 9:1.

Any ideas of what I'm doing wrong?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have to add the individual contributions and square the sum, not the other way round. This should give a ratio of 3:1 for the sum (as 2/3+1/3 != 2/3-1/3) and 9:1 for its square.
 
Thank you for your reply, mfb.

I appreciate the point that one has to square afterwards.

I think that my problem lies in the evaluation of the expectation value of the charge operator for each meson. What I'm doing for the ρ meson, for instance, is

\langle u \overline{u}-d \overline{d}|e_1+e_2|u \overline{u}-d \overline{d} \rangle=\frac{2}{3}-\frac{1}{3}-\frac{2}{3}+\frac{1}{3}=0,

where e_1 and e_2 represent the charge operators for each of the quark/antiquarks.

Obviously conceptually there is something wrong but I'm not sure what.

Thank you for your attention.
 
u can go to d + positive lepton only, u-bar can go to d-bar + negative lepton only - they are two different processes and do not add.
 
I do not quite understand your reply.

So, what I'm doing for calculating the expectation value of e_1, for the sake of the argument, is

\langle u\overline{u}-d\overline{d} | e_1|u\overline{u}-d\overline{d}\rangle=\langle u\overline{u}|e_1|u\overline{u}\rangle + \langle d\overline{d}|e_1|d\overline{d}\rangle = \frac{2}{3}-\frac{1}{3}=\frac{1}{3}

and analogously for e_2.
 
Calculate the decay widths for positive and negative leptons separately - they are two different processes, the amplitudes do not add.
 
To solve this, I first used the units to work out that a= m* a/m, i.e. t=z/λ. This would allow you to determine the time duration within an interval section by section and then add this to the previous ones to obtain the age of the respective layer. However, this would require a constant thickness per year for each interval. However, since this is most likely not the case, my next consideration was that the age must be the integral of a 1/λ(z) function, which I cannot model.
Back
Top