Calculations of Significant Figures

AI Thread Summary
A rectangular plate has a length of (21.3±0.2) cm and a width of (9.80±0.1) cm, leading to an area calculation of approximately (209±4) cm². The result is limited to three significant figures due to the precision of the input measurements. The uncertainties were not multiplied because their product (0.02) is negligible compared to the first-order uncertainties. This approach aligns with calculus principles, where higher-order terms are often disregarded. Understanding these concepts is crucial for accurate calculations involving significant figures and uncertainties.
playgames
Messages
1
Reaction score
1
A rectangular plate has a length of (21.3\pm0.2) cm and a
width of (9.80\pm0.1) cm. Find the area of the plate and the
uncertainty in the calculated area.

Solution
Area = lw = (21.3\pm0.2 cm) X (9.80\pm0.1 cm)
\cong(21.3 X 9.80 \pm 21.3 X 0.1 \pm 0.2 X 9.80) cm^2
\cong(209 \pm4) cm^2

Because the input data were given to only three significant
figures, we cannot claim any more in our result. Do you see
why we did not need to multiply the uncertainties 0.2 cm and
0.1 cm?
 
  • Like
Likes lookingforcj
Physics news on Phys.org
welcome to pf!

hi playgames! welcome to pf! :smile:

(try using the X2 icon just above the Reply box :wink:)
playgames said:
Solution
Area = lw = (21.3\pm0.2 cm) X (9.80\pm0.1 cm)
\cong(21.3 X 9.80 \pm 21.3 X 0.1 \pm 0.2 X 9.80) cm^2
\cong(209 \pm4) cm^2

Do you see why we did not need to multiply the uncertainties 0.2 cm and
0.1 cm?

because it's too small ever to be of significance …

0.2 * 0.1 = 0.02, which is two orders of magnitude smaller than anything else :wink:

(if you've done calculus, this is similar to writing (x + dx)(y + dy) = xy + xdy + ydx, and ignoring the dxdy as being "second-order")

the 21.3 X 9.80 is "ordinary", the 21.3 X 0.1 and 0.2 X 9.80 are "first-order" of smallness, and the missing 0.2 X 0.1 is "second-order" of smallness
 
  • Like
Likes lookingforcj
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top