I Calculus of Variations on Kullback-Liebler Divergence

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around minimizing Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence using variational calculus, specifically by setting the distribution q equal to p. The original poster expresses difficulty in understanding the calculus of variations, particularly the relevance of Euler-Lagrange equations and functional derivatives. Key advice includes considering the constraints on q as a probability distribution, such as ensuring it integrates to one and remains nonnegative. Additional resources are suggested for incorporating these constraints into the variational approach. Overall, the focus is on finding an optimal q to minimize KL divergence given a fixed p.
Master1022
Messages
590
Reaction score
116
TL;DR Summary
How to use calculus of variations on KL-divergence
Hi,

This isn't a homework question, but a side task given in a machine learning class I am taking.

Question: Using variational calculus, prove that one can minimize the KL-divergence by choosing ##q## to be equal to ##p##, given a fixed ##p##.

Attempt:

Unfortunately, I have never seen calculus of variations (it was suggested that we teach ourselves). I have been trying to watch some videos online, but I mainly just see references to Euler-Lagrange equations which I don't think are of much relevance here (please correct me if I am wrong) and not much explanation of the functional derivatives.

Nonetheless, I think this shouldn't be too hard, but am struggling to understand how to use the tools.

If we start with the definition of the KL-divergence we get:
\text{KL}[p||q] = \int p(x) log(\frac{p(x)}{q(x)}) dx = I

Would it be possible for anyone to help me get started on the path? I am not sure how to proceed really after I write down ## \frac{\delta I}{\delta q} ##?

Thanks in advance
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Euler Lagrange is what you want, but you also have to worry about the conditions that you have on q that come from it being a probability distribution, namely that the integral is 1 and it's always nonnegative. I think the integral constraint is the important part

http://liberzon.csl.illinois.edu/teaching/cvoc/node38.html

Has some notes on how to add constraints to the euler Lagrange equations.
 
Maybe you should start with fixed p, and then try to get optimal q to maximize or minimize KL.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top