Calorimetry problem (been stuck for an hour or so)

  • Thread starter Thread starter calrimetryftl
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Calorimetry Stuck
AI Thread Summary
A 25.0g ice cube at its melting point is added to water at 25.4ºC, reaching a final temperature of 15.0ºC. The discussion centers on using the mcΔt formula to solve for the original volume of water in the calorimeter, but it highlights the need to account for the phase change of the ice. The heat absorbed by the ice during melting (mΔH) must be included alongside the temperature change of the melted ice and the cooling of the water. Participants emphasize the importance of balancing the heat lost by the water with the heat gained by the ice. Understanding these concepts is crucial for accurately determining the original volume of water.
calrimetryftl
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
A 25.0g ice cube at its melting point is added to a calorimeter water at 25.4ºC. When thermal equilibrium is reached, the final temperature of the mixture is at 15.0ºC. The original volume of water in the calorimeter was?
This is all the data given.
A. 93.4mL
B. 136mL
C. 209mL
D. 228mL


I used the mcΔt = mcΔt formula, but the answer didn't seem to match the options given in my assignment.

I've been trying to figure this out for more than an hour now...please someone help, if I am using the wrong formula correct me.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
you have probably forgotten to incorporate phase change of the ice
 
How would I do that? sorry I'm a little lost :cry:
 
no prob.

when you put ice in water, the ice absorbs heat from its surroundings to change from a solid to a liquid. that change is mΔH where ΔH is the heat of fusion (and can be looked up in a table).

so while the water releases heat at mcΔT because there is a temperature change, the ice absorbs the heat the water released, does not change temperature, but instead changes phase. make sense?
 
oh and don't forget you still have to account for the change in temperature of that now 25g of water up to 15 C, so you have both melting and heating on one side and cooling on the other side of the equation.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top