Can a Killing Vector Field Prove v^\mu \nabla_\alpha R=0?

loops496
Messages
24
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


Suppose v^\mu is a Killing Vector field, the prove that:
v^\mu \nabla_\alpha R=0

Homework Equations


1) \nabla_\mu \nabla_\nu v^\beta = R{^\beta_{\mu \nu \alpha}} v^\alpha
2) The second Bianchi Identity.
3) If v^\mu is Killing the it satisfies then Killing equation, viz. \nabla_\mu v_\nu - \nabla_\nu v_\mu=0

The Attempt at a Solution


I know I should use normal coordinates making my life easier with the Christoffels and use the that the Riemann tensor appears when I have two covariant derivatives acting on a vector field, but I'm stuck and can't figure out how to proceed :(. Any help will be greatly appreciated.

M.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The equation you wrote down to prove would require that ##\nabla_\alpha R =0##. Perhaps you meant ## v^\mu \nabla_\mu R =0##? Also the Killing equation has a + sign: i.e. ##\nabla_\mu v_\nu + \nabla_\nu v_\mu =0##.

If so, you should be able to start with the expression ##\nabla_\nu (v^\mu {R^\nu}_\mu)##. You will need to use (1), the 2nd Bianchi identity in the form ##2 \nabla_\nu {R^\nu}_\mu = \nabla_\mu R## and the Killing equation will make various expressions vanish by symmetry of indices.
 
  • Like
Likes loops496
You're totally rigth fzero, it is v^\mu \nabla_\mu R=0 and I mistyped the sign killing equation (ooops sorry) shame on me :/.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top