Can a Lagrangian in QFT be Renormalizable?

Giuseppe Lacagnina
Messages
3
Reaction score
1
Possibly very silly question in QFT. Consider the Lagrangian for a scalar field theory.
A term like

g/φ^2

should be renormalizable on power counting arguments. The mass dimension of g should be

2 (D-1)

where D is the number of space-time dimensions.Does this make sense?
 
  • Like
Likes DuckAmuck
Physics news on Phys.org
Isn't there a rule where if the mass dimension is greater than 5, the term is non-renormalizable?
2(D-1)=6, if D=4.
 
As far as I know, a lagrangian term is not perturbatively renormalizable if it involves a coupling with negative mass dimension.
Like it happens for gravity or the Fermi model of weak interactions, which works as an effective theory with an energy cutoff.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
3K
Back
Top