Can a neutral insulator be attracted to a charged object?

AI Thread Summary
A neutral object can indeed be attracted to a charged rod, and the correct answer to the test question is C, as both conductors and insulators can exhibit this behavior. The attraction occurs due to induced charge separation, where electrons shift within the object. In conductors, this results in a stronger attraction due to the free movement of electrons, while in insulators, the attraction is weaker and involves molecular polarization. The discussion highlights that insulators, like paper, can still be attracted to charged objects despite their fixed electrons. Therefore, the initial answer provided in the test was incorrect.
jumbogala
Messages
414
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement


Hi all. I'm a teacher and one of my students asked me a question I couldn't answer today. It's a multiple choice question:

A neutral object is attracted to an electrically charged rod. The two are not touching. The neutral object:

A. is a conductor
B. is an insulator
C. could be either a conductor or an insulator

The answer key said A is correct.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



Reasoning of the answer key:
  • The neutral object is attracted to the rod because of an induced charge separation within the object.
  • Induced charge separations involve electrons shifting within the object.
  • In an insulator, electrons are fixed in place and cannot shift, so this object must be a conductor. Thus the answer is A.
However, earlier in the course, I showed the students that a charged rod can attract neutral pieces of paper. Paper is an insulator... so what gives? Is it just a bad test question?

Here is my guess: Perhaps within insulators you can still have some electron shifting, enough to attract them to charged things. However maybe the attraction would be weak. For a conductor there would be a lot more electron shifting and a stronger attraction. So should the answer to the test question actually be B?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's a good question, but answer A is the wrong answer. As you noted (and demonstrated), insulators are attracted to charged objects. The shifting of charge in an insulator corresponds to polarization of molecules.
http://www.physicsclassroom.com/class/estatics/Lesson-1/Polarization

jumbogala said:
So should the answer to the test question actually be B?
What about C?
 
  • Like
Likes jumbogala
TSny said:
It's a good question, but answer A is the wrong answer. As you noted (and demonstrated), insulators are attracted to charged objects. The shifting of charge in an insulator corresponds to polarization of molecules.
http://www.physicsclassroom.com/class/estatics/Lesson-1/Polarization

What about C?
Thanks for the link - it explains perfectly. So in a conductor, the shifting of charges corresponds to the "electron sea" in metals being more concentrated on one end of the object compared to the other. However, in an insulator, the electrons still stay with their molecules, but each molecule is polarized, which can lead to an attraction.

Oops - yes, the answer should be C! I wasn't being careful when I chose B.
 
  • Like
Likes TSny
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top