Can a radar detect a plastic object?

  • Thread starter Thread starter panthera
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Plastic Radar
AI Thread Summary
Radar can detect plastic objects since it functions by reflecting signals from surfaces, similar to how light reflects off opaque materials. Unlike metal detectors, radar can identify any non-stealth object that reflects electromagnetic waves, including plastics. Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) is particularly effective for locating buried plastic containers and landmines, as it detects variations in reflected signals from objects with different electrical properties. Stealth technology employs radar-absorbent materials and specific geometries to minimize radar reflection, making detection more challenging. Overall, radar's ability to detect plastic depends on the object's surface characteristics and the angles of incidence and reflection.
panthera
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
can a radar detect a plastic object? could the uhf and microwave signals be reflected by the target if it's made of plastic material? please give justifications :smile:

thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sure it can, radar doesn't act like a metal detector. If a surface can reflect light, radar can sure spot it. When you look at the plastic top on a bottle of soda or water you couldn't see it if it didnt reflect light. Just about anything that is opaque can be seen by radar, unless it is stealth. The way stealth aircraft work is that their covered in RAM or radar absorbant material. This is kind of like a clear paint whose media has a very high index of refraction. When light enters this "clear" layer of paint it becomes trapped inside and dissipates into thermal energy.
 
Try this site about Ground Penetrating Radar http://www.cpeo.org/techtree/ttdescript/gpr.htm

If it hits a buried object or a boundary with different electrical properties, the receiving antenna records variations in the reflected return signal.

It is the only reliable method for detecting buried plastic containers.

See also - http://www.soe.ucsc.edu/~milanfar/GPR2002SPIE.pdf (pdf file).

One application of GPR is the detection of plastic encased land-mines.

Stealth technology involves object geometry as well as radar absorbent material. Metals reflect radar, so the Stealth aircraft are largely non-metal composites. In additions, the sharp edges and faceted surfaces reflect the radar signal in other directions rather than back to the source/detector.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Do you think the skin depth plays any role? :smile: skin depth of an insulator is infinite...

however, if we go to molecular level, it depends on the frequency of vibration of the atoms;if that's more than the signal freq then it's detected else the signal gets absorbed...don't you think so? remember its a uhf/microwave signal.
 
abercrombiems02 said:
Sure it can, radar doesn't act like a metal detector. If a surface can reflect light, radar can sure spot it. When you look at the plastic top on a bottle of soda or water you couldn't see it if it didnt reflect light. Just about anything that is opaque can be seen by radar, unless it is stealth. The way stealth aircraft work is that their covered in RAM or radar absorbant material. This is kind of like a clear paint whose media has a very high index of refraction. When light enters this "clear" layer of paint it becomes trapped inside and dissipates into thermal energy.
The paint is important in a stealth aircraft, but even more important is the form.
When any electromagnetic wave hits a surface, it is partially refracted and partially reflected. The reflected wave forms with the normal to the surface an angle that is equal to the incidence angle.
If a radar emission hits a plane surface it will only be reflected to the receiving antenna if the surface is orthogonal to the direction of the wave. But if there is another surface forming a dihedral angle, the new reflection can be directed to the antenna.
An ordinary fighter has several dihedral angles: The wings to the body, the extra fuel tanks, bombs or missile to the wings etc.
A stealth plane is constructed so that it presents no dihedral angles, so the incident energy will be mostly scattered. The paint of course helps by absorbing part of that energy.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top