Can adiabatic process be isothermal process?

AI Thread Summary
An adiabatic process is defined as one where there is no heat transfer, while an isothermal process involves thermal equilibrium between two systems. The discussion clarifies that a system cannot be in thermal equilibrium with itself as it transitions from one state to another, meaning it cannot be both adiabatic and isothermal simultaneously. It emphasizes that thermal equilibrium requires interaction with an external system, such as the environment. The participants agree that while parts of a system can exchange heat internally, this does not equate to the entire system being in thermal equilibrium. The conversation concludes with appreciation for the insights shared.
sphyics
Messages
102
Reaction score
0
i'm entirely confused with this.

with analyzing each definition:

adiabatic process : a thermodynamic process in which there is no transfer of heat

if a system is in state (P1, V1, T1) → (P2, V2, T2) if it is adiabatic no heat transfer occurs, if no heat transfer occurs the two states must be in temperature equilibrium i.e the system will be in thermal equilibrium (isothermal process).
 
Science news on Phys.org
sphyics said:
... the two states must be in temperature equilibrium i.e the system will be in thermal equilibrium (isothermal process).

Note that when you mention 'two states', these are two states of the SAME system. That is the system is passing from one state to the other. At no time is the system in both of these states. So I do not think one can talk about two states being in thermal equilibrium.
 
grzz said:
Note that when you mention 'two states', these are two states of the SAME system. That is the system is passing from one state to the other.
yes..not an issue
grzz said:
At no time is the system in both of these states. So I do not think one can talk about two states being in thermal equilibrium.
please be more precise :)
 
Think of your system of being in a thermo can while performing the adiabatic process. Even if it would like to (because it has a different temperature than its environment) it can't exchange heat with the surrounding because it is thermally isolated from it.
Nevertheless there are also adiabatic processes which are at the same time isothermal.
 
Let me explain what I meant when I said, 'At no time is the system in both of these states. So I do not think one can talk about two states being in thermal equilibrium'.

'Thermal equilibrium between two systems' implies that there is no net transfer of heat between these two systems. Now the OP was considering a system passing from one state to another state. Part of a system can transfer heat to another part of the system but can a system transfer heat form its own initial state to its own final state?
 
@sphics
A system can't be in thermal equilibrium with itself. It can only be in equilibrium with some other system - e.g. the Lab. That would constitute an isothermal change and not an adiabatic one.
 
Now i understand :)
Thanks all for ur help and effort appreciate it :)
 
Back
Top