Can anyone help with cylindrical polar coords?

kala
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
1. Homework Statement
This is a question in my classical mechanics book, and i am not very good with polar coordinates. I am suppose to fine r, phi, z in terms of x,y,z.
Basically I need to derive the cylindrical polar coordinates from the Cartesian coordinates.
The question specifically asks Find expressions for the unit vectors r,phi,z of cylindrical polar coordinates in terms of the Cartesian coordinates.





3. The Attempt at a Solution
So far I have drawn a picture of cylinder and labeled everything i could. Now I know z=z, that is no problem. I know that x=r*cos[theta] and y=r*sin[theta], I also know that r=sqrt[x^2+y^2] and i know that phi=arctan[y/x]. The only way that i know how to derive these is drawing a triangle and showing it, is there any other way, like actually deriving them?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think drawing a triangle is exactly what you are expected to do. Well done. But why do you have both a phi and a theta floating around? There's only one angle in cylindrical coordinates.
 
Oops, i didn't catch that before thank you, another quick question, I am suppose to differentiate these expressions with respect to time to get dr/dt, dphi/dt and dz/dt.
But i got confused on this part because i don't really understand partial differentiation, would i have like something with a dot. I don't know sorry i am confused.
 
If you are the original poster, you aren't supposed to be running around with two user names. If you are stop using one, ok? Those aren't partial derivatives. I'm going to take a wild guess that the original problem is given x(t), y(t) and z(t), find those derivatives? If so then just take your equations and use the product and chain rules.
 
the question really says differentiate these expressions with respect to time to find dr/dt, dphi/dt, and dz/dt.
i guess i just don't see how to differentiate these, because aren't I differentiating with respect to t, but there isn't a t in any of the polar terms.
 
The only way I can interpret that is to find e.g. r'(t) as a function of x(t),x'(t),y(t),y'(t),z(t) and z'(t). Same for z(t) (easy one) and theta'(t).
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top