Can anyone suggest a linear algebra textbook?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the challenges faced with David Lay's "Linear Algebra and its Applications." The user finds the book readable but confusing due to frequent changes in notation and a lack of significant illustrative examples. They express concern over the book's conceptual cohesion, feeling overwhelmed by terminology introduced without clear relevance. While considering alternatives, they mention Shilov's book as potentially unsuitable for beginners and seek a more conceptual yet accessible textbook. Axler's "Linear Algebra Done Right" is recommended for its motivational approach and clarity, although it is noted to be abstract and not ideal for first-time learners. Anton's "Elementary Linear Algebra" is suggested as a gentler option. The user prefers intuitive examples that bridge theory and reality, indicating a struggle with applied math and a preference for theoretical approaches.
Rubicon
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I've seen loads of "what is the best Linear Algebra" threads but none quite match what I'm looking for. I'm currently using David Lay's Linear Algebra and its Applications, and I find the book readable, but strange.

He changes notations quite often and sometimes I have to try to figure out what he's talking about because his notations are different yet again. Also, his examples are not really illustrative of anything significant, are but simple calculations and step-by-step guides to how to solve problems.

I also find that it is not conceptually cohesive. I'm taking a summer course in Linear Algebra right now and it introduced a lot of terminology: "This is called x" but doesn't make it relevant what x actually signifies. As I progressed in math I found that a lot of the "jargon" are actually very meaningful, and I'm not getting that here, and the pace at which we're going only ensures that one day my ADHD brain will bet bowled over by all the terms. Maybe I'm missing the point, but I don't think he ties together concepts well.

I read a lot of good reviews on Shilov's book but also that it's not good for first-timers and wouldn't really be compatible with the course I'm taking- my professor pretty much lectures straight out of the book. Is there a good textbook that is more conceptual, but still accessible?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hey Rubicon, welcome to the physics forums!
I have read a bit of Lay's book, and am not a big fan of it. My favorite book on linear algebra is Axler's Linear Algebra Done Right. It provides plenty of motivation for the subject, and uses a clean, operator-theory approach that doesn't needlessly bring up matrices and determinants when they are not needed.

However, it is a pretty abstract treatment, in the classic theorem, proof, theorem, proof,... style. Are you looking for something with more physical or intuitive examples?
 
I second Axler, but as already noted he is not good for a first contact with LA. You could try Anton's elementary linear algebra for a gentler approach.
 
Thanks for the responses. Generally I like more intuitive examples. For some reason I have a hard time translating between theory and reality and physical examples always make me think of more variables than are relevant in the problem. I'm not very good at applied math and generally appreciate a more theoretical approach. I always "see" better when the examples are just points and lines, and when I think about things, even in other subjects such as history, I tend to see forces and light blots and colors.
 
TL;DR Summary: Book after Sakurai Modern Quantum Physics I am doing a comprehensive reading of sakurai and I have solved every problem from chapters I finished on my own, I will finish the book within 2 weeks and I want to delve into qft and other particle physics related topics, not from summaries but comprehensive books, I will start a graduate program related to cern in 3 months, I alreadily knew some qft but now I want to do it, hence do a good book with good problems in it first...
TLDR: is Blennow "Mathematical Methods for Physics and Engineering" a good follow-up to Altland "Mathematics for physicists"? Hello everybody, returning to physics after 30-something years, I felt the need to brush up my maths first. It took me 6 months and I'm currently more than half way through the Altland "Mathematics for physicists" book, covering the math for undergraduate studies at the right level of sophystication, most of which I howewer already knew (being an aerospace engineer)...

Similar threads

Replies
17
Views
7K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
6K
Back
Top