Can Arithmetic Progressions Form Infinite Relatively Prime Subsequences?

  • Thread starter Thread starter robin_vanp
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Arithmetic
robin_vanp
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
a question came up

"show that the arithmetic progression ax+b contains an infinite subsequence (not necessarily a progression), every two of whose elements are relatively prime."

i have a hunch that the chinese remainder theorem has something to do with this, but I'm not sure how. any thoughts?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is that true? What if a=2, b=o?
 
sorry, assuming a, b are non zero
 
Then a=2, b=2 is a counterexample. I think you really need that a and b are coprime, in which case the sequence actually contains infinitely many primes.
 
right again. its actually a two part question so it says on the top that (a,b) = 1, i forget to mention; if so (now that we finally got the problem) how is the CRT applicable here?
 
and deriving some sort of solution that does not employ dirichlet's theorem, i think, because then that would be obvious; i really do not know how the CRT can be used here.
 
Thread 'Derivation of equations of stress tensor transformation'
Hello ! I derived equations of stress tensor 2D transformation. Some details: I have plane ABCD in two cases (see top on the pic) and I know tensor components for case 1 only. Only plane ABCD rotate in two cases (top of the picture) but not coordinate system. Coordinate system rotates only on the bottom of picture. I want to obtain expression that connects tensor for case 1 and tensor for case 2. My attempt: Are these equations correct? Is there more easier expression for stress tensor...

Similar threads

Back
Top