Can complex systems be reduced to simpler parts without losing function?

  • Thread starter Thread starter garytse86
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the concept of irreducible complexity (IC) in biological systems versus mechanical systems, specifically using watches as an analogy. Participants argue that while some biological systems, like blood clotting, have been cited as IC, further analysis reveals they are not irreducibly complex. The lecturer emphasized that biological systems are dynamic and can evolve over time, which contrasts with the static nature of mechanical devices. The analogy of a watch is critiqued for oversimplifying the complexities of biological organisms.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of irreducible complexity in biological systems
  • Familiarity with the concept of dynamic biological evolution
  • Basic knowledge of mechanical systems and their functions
  • Critical thinking skills to analyze analogies and their limitations
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the concept of irreducible complexity in detail, focusing on examples like blood clotting
  • Explore the dynamics of biological evolution and how systems adapt over time
  • Study the limitations of analogies in scientific discourse, particularly in biology
  • Investigate the characteristics of viruses and their classification as living systems
USEFUL FOR

Biologists, educators, philosophers of science, and anyone interested in the debate surrounding intelligent design and the nature of complex systems.

garytse86
Messages
311
Reaction score
0
we had a lecture on intelligent design (or should I say - one against ID). the lecturer went into great detail as to how some complex systems that are apparently irredicubly complex can actually be taken apart, and the system still works. e.g. the blood clotting system.

what I don't appreciate is that how does one explain the design of a watch - obviously without any composite part the watch becomes dysfunctional. Any ideas?
 
Biology news on Phys.org
actually I've got some ideas but have work for tomorrow.. will post later
 
A watch is a simple device with only a couple subsystems, which can still perform their functions independently.

The primary complexity of a watch is simply cutting out the pieces accurately.
 
Trying to prove irreductable complexity using analogies is wrong, whether you do it in one direction or the other.

Why is it wrong? Analogies are just illusions created by your brain; something that appears to be another thing, when there's only incidental resemblence.
 
A watch is not a biological organism. Just because you can pull a piece off a human invention to make it stop working does not mean that everything complex is irreducably so. Like SF said, don't take an analogy too literally. Anyway, there are some parts of watch that you can remove and it can still function to tell time.

Biological systems are dynamic. Things are added/changed/removed over time. There could have been additional biochemical supports that helped the emerging biological system along which were later lost. So the current system superficially appears to be irreducable. Check out this link for an explanation...
http://pharyngula.org/index/weblog/comments/flap_those_gills_and_fly/#continue

The point your instructor should have made is that ID's claims of IC have not been demonstrated. (i.e., ID has cited some examples of IC systems, like blood clotting, but further inspections of each of their claims have shown that they are not IC)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Take the minute hand out of the watch (one part). Stick it into the ground where it can form a shadow from the sun. Time emerges from the movement of the shadow. Watch is not a IC system, its function is to tell time, this can be done with one part from the watch plus energy from sun.

Consider virus--if you define life as a system having ability to reproduce using nucleic acids (as I do) then virus is a living system, but it not what I would call IC, since it only has two major functional parts (membrane & nucleic acid)--but perhaps virus, seen as a very simple "cell" is as close to the "concept" of an IC system in biology that we can find.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
11K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K