Can conversion methods in chemistry be applied to electrical engineering?

  • Thread starter Thread starter somuumos
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Chemistry
AI Thread Summary
Conversion methods in chemistry, such as calculating solubility ratios, do not directly apply to electrical engineering concepts like breakdown voltage. The breakdown voltage of air is influenced by factors such as pressure and follows the Paschen curve, making it a more complex relationship than simple ratios. While both fields share mathematical principles, the specific applications differ significantly. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding the underlying physics and mathematics rather than relying on direct analogies. Overall, applying chemical conversion techniques to electrical quantities is not appropriate due to the differing principles involved.
somuumos
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
can we use some conversion types of chemistry in electrical. Lke in chemistry we used to calculate that if mass of 50g require 500ml of water to dissolve then mass of 10g requires = (500*10)/50 . similarly can we use the same tecnique to find some electrical quantities for example dielectric of strength of air is 30 kv/cm which means for 1cm gap of air 30 kv can be applied w/o breakdown so if i calclute the same for 0.8 cm as (30k*0.8)/1 will it be right or wrong...
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF.
Many fields of science share the same mathematical description.
Unfortunately the two you suggest, chemical solubility and the breakdown voltage of a gas, are not good analogues.
The breakdown voltage of air is determined by pressure. Paschen curve.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paschen's_law#Paschen_curve

The breakdown does not always occur in a straight line, it can take a curved path, called an “arc”.
 
somuumos said:
in chemistry we used to calculate that if mass of 50g require 500ml of water to dissolve then mass of 10g requires = (500*10)/50

That's an application of a direct proportionality (or ratios). It has nothing to do with chemistry, you just learned it during a chemistry course. Shame on those teaching you, it is a basic math, and math lessons is where you should be shown how to do such things.
 
Borek said:
That's an application of a direct proportionality (or ratios). It has nothing to do with chemistry, you just learned it during a chemistry course. Shame on those teaching you, it is a basic math, and math lessons is where you should be shown how to do such things.

thanks for your concern. i got it know.
 
Very basic question. Consider a 3-terminal device with terminals say A,B,C. Kirchhoff Current Law (KCL) and Kirchhoff Voltage Law (KVL) establish two relationships between the 3 currents entering the terminals and the 3 terminal's voltage pairs respectively. So we have 2 equations in 6 unknowns. To proceed further we need two more (independent) equations in order to solve the circuit the 3-terminal device is connected to (basically one treats such a device as an unbalanced two-port...
suppose you have two capacitors with a 0.1 Farad value and 12 VDC rating. label these as A and B. label the terminals of each as 1 and 2. you also have a voltmeter with a 40 volt linear range for DC. you also have a 9 volt DC power supply fed by mains. you charge each capacitor to 9 volts with terminal 1 being - (negative) and terminal 2 being + (positive). you connect the voltmeter to terminal A2 and to terminal B1. does it read any voltage? can - of one capacitor discharge + of the...
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Back
Top