Can Converting Secant to Cosine Simplify Integration by Parts?

AStaunton
Messages
100
Reaction score
1
problem is to integrate the following by parts:

\int x\sec^{2}xdx

my feeling is convert the secant term to cosine by:

sec^{2}x=cos^{-2}x\Rightarrow\int\sec^{2}xdx=\int\cos^{-2}xdx

then:

u=\cos^{-2}x\implies du=2\sin x(\cos^{-3}x)

and also:

dv=xdx\implies v=\frac{x^{2}}{2}

however plugging all this into int. by parts equation ends up with:

\frac{x^{2}}{2}\cos^{-2}x-\int2\frac{x^{2}}{2}\sin x\cos^{-3}xdx

which seems to be an even more complicated integral...

is my idea of converting the secant to cosine a good or does it make more complicated?

any advice appreciated
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I wouldn't convert the secant term at all. Remember that sec2 x is the derivative of some trig function.
 
While recognizing the antiderivative of sec^2(x) is the real key to this problem, many times it will make the problem easier if you can eliminate the polynomial portion by choosing that as your u.
 
osnarf said:
While recognizing the antiderivative of sec^2(x) is the real key to this problem, many times it will make the problem easier if you can eliminate the polynomial portion by choosing that as your u.
In this case: both of these ideas will work together.

\text{Let: }u=x\quad\text{ and let: }\quad dv=\sec^2(x)\,dx\ .

This works out nicely!
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top