Can heat flow and work done be determined using the grand partition function?

pivoxa15
Messages
2,250
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


When modeling ideal gas molecules using a grand partition ensemble, is heat flow = 0? So if U=Q-W then in a grand canonical ensemble, U=-W?

The Attempt at a Solution


I think so as the system is in thermal equilibrium with the surroundings. So in this system the total energy is negative the work done by the particles in the system?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
This equation is wrong: U=Q-W , if no further explanation is given.
And what do you call heat flow. Heat flowing from where to where?
And why particles in a system would be doing work on this system?
 
I have seen U=Q+W in books but my one is U=Q-W.

Q is heat flow from the outside to inside the system.

W is work done by particles in the system. So it could be gas particles pushing on the boundaries of the system caused by random collision between the particles, in turn pushing each other leading them to randomly crashing to the boundaries.

U is the internal energy of the system.
 
The grand partition function describes a system in a large heat bath so in fact U=Q-W where Q is non zero because U describes the energy of the system rather than the whole bath. So Q is non zero as it can fluctuate when not in thermal equilibrium.
 
Pivoxa15,

Remember that U is a state function while Q and W are no state functions.
Q and W are variations of internal energy under particular transformations.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top