Can Hess's Law be used to systematically manipulate chemical formulas?

  • Thread starter Thread starter courtrigrad
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Method Uncertainty
AI Thread Summary
Hess's Law can be systematically applied to manipulate chemical formulas, although it often requires a methodical approach rather than guesswork. The discussion emphasizes that while many homework problems can be solved by inspection, algebraic methods can be useful for more complex scenarios. Participants explain how to derive coefficients for reactions by comparing the coefficients of reactants and products in the desired equation and the given reactions. It is clarified that the values of enthalpy changes (∆H1, ∆H2, ∆H3) are typically provided or can be looked up, aiding in the calculation of the overall enthalpy change (∆Hcomb). The conversation concludes with a consensus on the importance of understanding coefficient relationships in chemical equations.
courtrigrad
Messages
1,236
Reaction score
2
Hello all

I was just wondering whether there is any systematic way in manipulating chemical formulas using Hess's Law to come up with the desired equation. Do you always have to guess and check Is it possible to use algebra and linear algebra?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
any ideas?
 
There will be no systematic way if you are not told which equations to use (this is true of real life problems but not often of homework problems), to get the desired overall equation.

For nearly every homework problem I've seen, it's easy enough figuring it out by inspection (of course, you want to be smart about this, rather than randomly trying combinations), that using some algorithm might actually be slower.

That said, what you want is simply the values of k_i such that
f(a,b,c,d,...,n) = \sum _i k_i f_i(a,b,c,d,...,n)
This simply results in a set of n simultaneous equations in the coefficients k_i, which may be solved by your chosen method (straight algebraic manipulation, using determinants, etc.)

Example (an easy one for simplicity, and I'm dispensing with details of the states, and such) :

We want CH_4 + 2O_2 \rightarrow CO_2 + 2H_2O~, ~~\Delta H_{comb}

given

C + 2H_2 \rightarrow CH_4~,~~\Delta H_1
C + O_2 \rightarrow CO_2~,~~\Delta H_2
2H_2 + O_2 \rightarrow 2H_2O~,~~\Delta H_3

Assume that

\Delta H_{comb} = k_1 \Delta H_1 + k_2 \Delta H_2 + k_3 \Delta H_3

Then, comparing terms we have :

from~~CH_4~:~1 = -k_1~~~~~(1)

from~~H_2~:~0 = 2k_1 + 2k_3 ~~~~~(2)

from~~C~:~0 = k_1 + k_2 ~~~~~(3)

from~~O_2~:~2 = k_2 + k_3 ~~~~~(4)

from~~H_2O~:~-2 = -2k_3 ~~~~~(5)

from~~CO_2~:~-1 = -k_2 ~~~~~(6)

Notice how I use +ve signs for terms on the LHS and -ve signs for terms on the RHS.

Anyway, we have 6 equations with 3 unknowns, of which, we suspect the other 3 will be redundant (but we shall verify this).

(1) tells us that k_1 = -1. Substituting this in (3) gives k_2 = 1. And (5) gives k_3 = 1. Clearly, these values also satisfy (2) (4) and (6), so they are consistent.

Hence, \Delta H_{comb} = - \Delta H_1 + \Delta H_2 + \Delta H_3

Of course, this would have be easier done by inspection, but this shows that an approach exists that will work well for the more complex problems, perhaps.
 
Last edited:
Thanks a lot. But aren't you given the value of ∆H1 ∆H2 and ∆H3? I am not sure how you got the value of k1 k2 and k3.

Any help is appreciated

Thanks!
 
courtrigrad said:
Thanks a lot. But aren't you given the value of ∆H1 ∆H2 and ∆H3? I am not sure how you got the value of k1 k2 and k3.

Any help is appreciated

Thanks!

Yes, you are given the values of ∆H1 ∆H2 and ∆H3, from which you want to find the value of ∆H(comb).

What don't you understand about the method used for determining the values of k1, k2 and k3 ?

Drat, I thought the explanation was understandable, but apparently not. Let me try and improve on it. But first, I need to understand the source of your confusion.

Do you agree that the objective is to find ∆H(comb) in terms of ∆H1, ∆H2 and ∆H3 ? Do you agree that the way to do this involves finding coefficients that multiply each of the given equations so that the sums or differences will result in the required equation ? Does it make sense that by multiplying by a -ve coefficient, you are simply reversing the direction of the reaction ?

Where exactly are you having a problem with my approach ?
 
like when you say:

from CH4: a = -k1
from H2: 0 = 2k1 + 2k3

etc.. how do we know this without knowing ∆H1 ∆H2 and ∆H3? Did we just look them up in the table?

Thanks a lot
 
Typically, you know the values of ∆H1 ∆H2 and ∆H3. Either they will be given to you, in the problem, or you can look them up in a table.

As for the determination of the values of k, I was merely comparing coefficients of the different compounds between the parent reaction and the sub-reactions (which have been multiplied by k1, k2, k3 respectively).

In other words, compare the coefficients in : CH_4 + 2O_2 \rightarrow CO_2 + 2H_2O

with those in the sum of :

(k_1)C + 2(k_1)H_2 \rightarrow (k_1)CH_4,
(k_2)C + (k_2)O_2 \rightarrow (k_2)CO_2 and
2(k_3)H_2 + (k_3)O_2 \rightarrow 2(k_3)H_2O

The coeffecient of CH_4 in the main equation is 1. Its coefficient in the sum in -k1. Hence 1 = -k1.

Now since H_2 does not appear in the main equation, its coefficient there is 0. But it appears twice in the sum, with coefficients 2k1 and 2k3. So, 0 = 2k1 + 2k3.

Did that help ?
 
yes this help immensely. i forgot to flip the arrow for the decomposition reaction

Thanks!
 
Back
Top