Can Metal-Bromine Batteries Be the Next Big Thing in Energy Storage?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Stanley514
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Batteries
AI Thread Summary
Metal-bromine batteries, particularly Zinc/Bromine, show promise for energy storage, but alternatives like Calcium/Bromine and Magnesium/Bromine are being explored for their potential energy density and rechargeability. The theoretical energy densities for Calcium Bromide and Magnesium Bromide are significantly higher than that of Zinc Bromide. However, the high reactivity of metallic calcium and magnesium poses storage challenges, although they may be easier to handle than sodium or lithium in other battery types. Researchers are actively investigating Magnesium-Sulfur batteries and other bromine-based concepts for applications in renewable energy. Overall, while there are hurdles to overcome, the development of bromine-based batteries could lead to viable solutions for energy storage.
Stanley514
Messages
404
Reaction score
2
Currently there exist Zinc/Bromine batteries which could be recharged many times.
What about such pairs as Calcium/Bromine or Magnesium/Bromine?
Could somebody predict their properties such as energy density or rechargeability?
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Maximum theoretical energy density is trivial (basic thermodynamics and a molar mass), rechargeability is where the problem is.
 
Maximum theoretical energy density is trivial (basic thermodynamics and a molar mass), rechargeability is where the problem is.
Calcium Bromide enthalpy of formation = 647.9 kJ/mol http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Calcium_bromide
Magnesium Bromide enthalpy of formation = 524.3 kJ/mol
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnesium_bromide

In comparison:
Zinc Bromide 328 kJ/mol
Sodium Sulfide 364 Kj/mol

Looks like very good energy density.

Rechargeability:
Calcium Bromide soluble in water (143 g/100 ml (20°C)), alcohol, acetone.
Magnesium Bromide soluble in water (102 g/100 mL (anhydrous)), ethanol: 6.9 g/100 mL, methanol: 21.8 g/100 mL.

Problems?
 
Because of a high reactivity it is not that easy to store metallic calcium (or magnesium) safely and not reacting with whatever is present in the battery.

I am not saying it can't be done, just it will be definitely tricky.
 
Because of a high reactivity it is not that easy to store metallic calcium (or magnesium) safely and not reacting with whatever is present in the battery.
But certainly much easier than metallic Sodium in Sodium-Sulfur batteries or metallic lithium in Lithium-air cells. Currently many researchers work on Magnesium-Sulfur battery. They do not report any problems with metallic Magnesium. There are Aluminum-air fuel cells. Is Aluminum less reactive than Calcium?
I think Bromine based batteries could be used in some stand alone applications such as renewable energy or power plants, where toxicity of Bromine is a lesser issue.
 
Last edited:
IND LLC is working on solving some of the problems you discuss.. It should be possible to make two types of batteries - one is a flow battery like zinc - bromine battery where the bromine is stored externally ; the other one can compete with lithium ion batteries. I also noticed a hydrogen - bromine battery concept from MIT.
Neale
 
I want to test a humidity sensor with one or more saturated salt solutions. The table salt that I have on hand contains one of two anticaking agents, calcium silicate or sodium aluminosilicate. Will the presence of either of these additives (or iodine for that matter) significantly affect the equilibrium humidity? I searched and all the how-to-do-it guides did not address this question. One research paper I found reported that at 1.5% w/w calcium silicate increased the deliquescent point by...
Back
Top