Can Metal Plate Connected to +ve Battery Terminal Get Charged?

AI Thread Summary
Connecting a single metal plate to the positive terminal of a battery can result in the plate acquiring a positive charge due to the higher potential of the terminal. However, the charge gained will be minimal because the plate's self-capacitance is significantly lower than that of two parallel plates. The concept of potential is relative, and a single plate does not establish a complete circuit, limiting its ability to hold a substantial charge. The charge on the plate can be calculated using the formula q=V*C_self, indicating that while it can be charged, the amount will be negligible. Overall, while a single plate can acquire some charge, its practical significance is minimal.
bobca117
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hi,

We know that when we connect the two parallel plates to a battery it will hold a +ve charge on the plate connected to positive terminal and -ve charge on the other plate. If we only connect one plate to the positive terminal, can it be charged? Isn't the positive terminal is at a higher potential and positively charged? If so, can metal plate connected to it become charged? What process governs if it cannot be charged? Since conductors having charges when connected reaches an equilibrium of distribution of charges to maintain same potential, can we expect this in the case of battery with metal plate connected to positive terminal? if not why?

Bob
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, it will get charged.
But, I wouldn't bother mentioning it to anyone.
Nobody is going to care much about an extra electon or two.

Battery terminals have a relative, to each other, potential.
Saying one has a higher potential doesn't really mean anything.
As in, higher relative to what?
 
A single metal plate will have a small self capacitance C_self.
It can be calculated for a simple shape, but will be much less than the capacitance of two plates. The charge on the single plate would be
q=V*C_self.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...

Similar threads

Back
Top