Can Momentum Save an Astronaut 200m Away from the ISS?

  • Thread starter Thread starter MathewsMD
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Momentum Relative
AI Thread Summary
An astronaut, detached from the ISS and 200m away, attempts to return by throwing a 10 kg tool kit at 8 m/s. The discussion centers on the calculation of momentum, noting that both the astronaut and tool kit are initially at rest relative to the ISS, resulting in an initial momentum of zero. Questions arise about the correct frame of reference for calculating momentum, particularly regarding the initial conditions of motion. The key point is that the astronaut's action of throwing the tool kit generates momentum that can help her return. Understanding the rest frame and relative motion is crucial for solving the problem effectively.
MathewsMD
Messages
430
Reaction score
7
An 80 kg astronaut has become detached from the safety line connecting her to the International Space Station. She's 200m from the station, at rest relative to it, and has 4 min of air remaining. To get herself back, she tosses a 10 kg tool kit away from the station at 8 m/s. Will she make it back in time?

GGzG83U.png


In the question, the solution uses momentum and calculates it for both the astronaut and tool box since they are at rest only relative to the space station, not the rest frame. Here it shows initial momentum is equal to 0, though. If they are calculating momentum in the rest frame, shouldn't there be an initial momentum of p = (ma + mt)vrel, but it is 0...why? Is not the astronaut and toolbox in motion initially and once again afterwards? Any explanation on why the momentum is paired the way it is would be very helpful! :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is the rest frame, if it is not a frame of reference where the object/s of interest are at rest?

No other relative position or motion information has been given in this problem, other than " She's 200m from the station, at rest relative to it".

Following from this, the formula you have stated for initial momentum is correct - p = (ma + mt)vrel.
Now what value would you choose for vrel?
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...

Similar threads

Back
Top