Can Parametrized Plane Curves Have Constant Curvature?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mandelbroth
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Curves Plane
Mandelbroth
Messages
610
Reaction score
24

Homework Statement


Suppose ##\sigma:I\subseteq\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}^2## is a smooth plane curve parametrized by a parameter ##t\in I##. Prove that if ##\|\sigma(t_1)-\sigma(t_0)\|## depends entirely on ##|t_1-t_0|##, then the image of ##I## under ##\sigma## is a subset of either ##S^1## or a line.

The Attempt at a Solution


Embarrassingly enough, I'm having trouble setting up a proof here. I understand intuitively why this is true, but I can't see where to start. Can someone just nudge me in the right direction?

Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Mandelbroth said:

Homework Statement


Suppose ##\sigma:I\subseteq\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}^2## is a smooth plane curve parametrized by a parameter ##t\in I##. Prove that if ##\|\sigma(t_1)-\sigma(t_0)\|## depends entirely on ##|t_1-t_0|##, then the image of ##I## under ##\sigma## is a subset of either ##S^1## or a line.

The Attempt at a Solution


Embarrassingly enough, I'm having trouble setting up a proof here. I understand intuitively why this is true, but I can't see where to start. Can someone just nudge me in the right direction?

Thank you.

Suppose \|\sigma(t_1) - \sigma(t_0)\| = f(|t_1 - t_0|) for some real-valued f such that f(t) \geq 0 for all t with f(0) = 0. Then
<br /> \sigma(t_1) = \sigma(t_0) + \hat n(t_0,t_1) f(|t_1 - t_0|)\qquad(1)<br />
where \hat n is a unit vector. This can be rearranged to give
<br /> \sigma(t_0) = \sigma(t_1) - \hat n(t_0,t_1) f(|t_1 - t_0|)<br />
and swapping t_0 and t_1 and comparing with (1) yields
\hat n(t_0, t_1) = -\hat n(t_1,t_0)

I don't know whether this will lead anywhere. However I do see that if \hat n is constant then \sigma(I) will be a line segment.

EDIT: It also occurs to me that circles and lines are the only plane curves of constant curvature.
 
Last edited:
pasmith said:
Suppose \|\sigma(t_1) - \sigma(t_0)\| = f(|t_1 - t_0|) for some real-valued f such that f(t) \geq 0 for all t with f(0) = 0. Then
<br /> \sigma(t_1) = \sigma(t_0) + \hat n(t_0,t_1) f(|t_1 - t_0|)\qquad(1)<br />
where \hat n is a unit vector. This can be rearranged to give
<br /> \sigma(t_0) = \sigma(t_1) - \hat n(t_0,t_1) f(|t_1 - t_0|)<br />
and swapping t_0 and t_1 and comparing with (1) yields
\hat n(t_0, t_1) = -\hat n(t_1,t_0)

I don't know whether this will lead anywhere. However I do see that if \hat n is constant then \sigma(I) will be a line segment.

EDIT: It also occurs to me that circles and lines are the only plane curves of constant curvature.
I realized that they are both the only plane curves with constant curvature, then I proceeded to cook up a proof.

Thank you.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top