Can Particle Beams Effectively Vaporize Dangerous Asteroids?

  • Thread starter Thread starter GTOM
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Asteroid
AI Thread Summary
Particle beams and lasers are being considered as potential solutions for diverting or vaporizing dangerous asteroids threatening space stations. A calculation suggests that 10 MJ could vaporize 1 kg of titanium, raising questions about the safety of vaporized debris and its dispersion. The discussion highlights the challenges of redirecting asteroids using steam pressure or kinetic impacts, emphasizing the need for early detection to effectively apply these methods. Additionally, the potential for mining resources from asteroids is mentioned, proposing a dual benefit of resource acquisition and threat mitigation. Overall, the feasibility of using advanced technologies like particle beams for asteroid defense remains a topic of exploration and debate.
GTOM
Messages
963
Reaction score
66
Lets suppose a space station is threatened by a meteor or some kind of space debris, and the station couldn't be moved fast enough. Could lasers, or particle beams become a realistic solution for that situation in not so far future?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Particle-beam_weaponIt talked about a GJ power, although i am not sure it is credible enough.

Lets suppose we have only 10 MJ. If i calculate correctly 10 MJ is enough to vaporize 1kg of titanium in vacuum.
Could be the vapor, or melted metal still dangerous, or would it disperse fast enough? Or redirect the dangerous object with steam pressure?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Liquid vs. solid doesn't make a difference for an impact, but vapor will spread out really fast and won't be a threat.
GTOM said:
Or redirect the dangerous object with steam pressure?
You get a bit of propulsion from ablating the surface, but doing that in a directed way will be very challenging.
 
All depends on how much of a nudge is needed.
A pebble is a lot different from a boulder or from a mountain, yet if one can apply the nudge early enough, a miss can be achieved even with just a small impulse.
Iirc, NASA has proposed diverting potentially hazardous bodies simply by having a diversionary spacecraft fly near it and shift the trajectory by its gravitational pull. The challenge is to find the hazardous items early enough that one can try to deal with them without dubious brute force methods.
 
GTOM said:
Lets suppose a space station is threatened by a meteor or some kind of space debris, and the station couldn't be moved fast enough. Could lasers, or particle beams become a realistic solution for that situation in not so far future?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Particle-beam_weaponIt talked about a GJ power, although i am not sure it is credible enough.

Lets suppose we have only 10 MJ. If i calculate correctly 10 MJ is enough to vaporize 1kg of titanium in vacuum.
Could be the vapor, or melted metal still dangerous, or would it disperse fast enough? Or redirect the dangerous object with steam pressure?
What about the equal and opposite reaction on the space station?
 
tech99 said:
What about the equal and opposite reaction on the space station?

The station has bigger mass and better cooling.
 
Is it also possible to impact the asteroid with large railguns? Even the asteroid isn’t obliterated, it still passes a lot of kinetic energy to the asteroid, thus changing its trajectory.
Actually, if we can harvest the resources of the incoming asteroid, it is a mountain of precious metals and minerals, including things that are very rare on earth... in this case, we pull the asteroid to orbit around earth, and mine the resources on it. It also saves delta-V to redirect an incoming asteroid towards Earth than seeking them in deep space or asteroid belt...
 
Are you sure you want to do this? If you had vapourised the asteroid which created the Chicxulub crater 66 million years ago you would have stopped the descent of man.
 
  • Haha
Likes anorlunda

Similar threads

Back
Top