Can Sub Lengths Be Equally Divided Among Three TAs?

  • Thread starter Thread starter remaan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hard
remaan
Messages
132
Reaction score
0
Hard problem - dividing the subs !

Homework Statement



Anupam brought n > 0 subs, one each of length 1; 2; 3;... ; n, to a grading party.
The three TAs distributed the subs among themselves such that no sub was broken, and each TA
ended up with an equal total length. For what values of n is such a division possible?


Homework Equations


At some point, we may use the the sum formula : n(n+1)/2


The Attempt at a Solution



I tried finding a pattern

n = 1
we have only one sub, doesn't work

n= 2
doesn't work

n=3
doesn't work, as we can't divide this by 3 people.

n=4
doesn't work,

n= 5
it works !
we have 1,2,3,4,5
we can divide by 3 as follows :
one of the TAs will take 5
The other will take 4,1
The third will take 2,3

So, how should I precede with that ?

Do you think this is the right thing ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


It's good that you looked for a pattern right off the start, but I think the main focus is in the formula they gave you (n(n+1)/2). This formula is the what you would use to find 1 + 2 + 3 +...+n. So in the context of this question (n(n + 1))/2 gives you the total length of bread that will be available.
Hope this helps.
 


Mmm...
Ya But the problem with that is:
Knowing how long bread I have Doesn't solve the problem, since
I Am not Able to break the breads apart.

So, any extra hints ??
 


Think about each bread as an integer. The fact that we can't break apart any bread when we divide the total length by 3 is important as it tells us something about the expression:
\frac{1}{3} \frac{n(n+1)}{2} , mainly that it can only take on values from a specific set.
Hope this helps
 
Last edited:


Ok. now suppose I found the two numbers -
are there any hints of how to prove them ?
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top