Can The Joule Coefficient be Derived Using the First Law and Maxwell Relation?

lee403
Messages
16
Reaction score
1
The Joule coefficient, μJ, is defined as μ = (∂T/∂V)U. Show that μJ CV = p – αT/κ

Relevant equations
Cv=(∂U/∂T)v
κT=-1/V*(∂V/∂p)T
α=1/V*(∂V/∂T)p
dV(T,p)=(∂V/∂T)pdt+(∂V/∂p)TdpWhat I have attempted was to make μ = (∂T/∂V)U=(∂T/∂U)V(∂U/∂V)T=(∂U/∂V)T*Cv-1.

Then α/κT=(∂V/∂T)p/(∂V/∂p)T because the 1/V cancels.

Since (∂V/∂T)p=(∂V/∂p)T *(∂p/∂T)V
p – αT/κ becomes p-T(∂p/∂T)V

so μJ*Cv = (∂U/∂V)T (because Cv and Cv-1 cancel)
(∂U/∂V)T= p-T(∂p/∂T)V

I try to make the assumption that it is an ideal gas so (∂p/∂T)V becomes nR/V
so then p-T(nR/V)= p-p= 0. But that would mean (∂U/∂V)T = 0.

I don't know that this statement is true or if it is safe to assume an ideal gas. I am afraid that maybe I missed a negative or that I used properties of partial differentials incorrectly. Can anyone provide assistance?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello. Welcome to PF.

You don't want to assume an ideal gas.

You've gotten to μ = (∂U/∂V)T*Cv-1. So, you need to deal with the factor (∂U/∂V)T. The first law will be helpful. Then, maybe use a Maxwell relation.
 
  • Like
Likes Chestermiller
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top