Can the Sigma Be Removed from the Normalization Equation for a Wavefunction?

  • Thread starter Thread starter zahra95
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Wavefunction
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around normalizing a wavefunction and the role of the sigma in the normalization equation. Participants emphasize that sigma cannot be ignored and suggest finding an expression for the norm of the wavefunction. They propose testing with a simpler sum to understand the normalization process better. Additionally, there is a recommendation to research "sums of reciprocal powers" for further insight. The conversation highlights the complexity of normalization in quantum mechanics and the importance of careful mathematical treatment.
zahra95
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


the wavefunction
upload_2016-1-30_13-3-48.png


where <
upload_2016-1-30_13-0-34.png
|
upload_2016-1-30_13-1-16.png
> =
upload_2016-1-30_13-0-5.png
. I want to normalize it and find constant normalization A. A is real number.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


I know that for normalizing the wave function

upload_2016-1-30_13-6-58.png

but what happen for sigma? can I remove it from equation?
 

Attachments

  • upload_2016-1-30_12-56-9.png
    upload_2016-1-30_12-56-9.png
    278 bytes · Views: 422
  • upload_2016-1-30_12-56-17.png
    upload_2016-1-30_12-56-17.png
    220 bytes · Views: 405
  • upload_2016-1-30_12-56-59.png
    upload_2016-1-30_12-56-59.png
    278 bytes · Views: 413
  • upload_2016-1-30_13-2-42.png
    upload_2016-1-30_13-2-42.png
    687 bytes · Views: 453
  • upload_2016-1-30_13-4-26.png
    upload_2016-1-30_13-4-26.png
    808 bytes · Views: 458
Physics news on Phys.org
You can't just ignore the sigma! First, can you find an expression for ##||\phi||^2##?
 
I think the equation is :
upload_2016-1-30_13-49-39.png
because <
upload_2016-1-30_13-0-34-png.png
|
upload_2016-1-30_13-1-16-png.png
> =
upload_2016-1-30_13-0-5-png.png
is it correct? I'm not sure!
but what I do after that?
 

Attachments

  • upload_2016-1-30_13-44-25.png
    upload_2016-1-30_13-44-25.png
    839 bytes · Views: 442
zahra95 said:
I think the equation is :View attachment 95040because <
upload_2016-1-30_13-0-34-png.png
|
upload_2016-1-30_13-1-16-png.png
> =
upload_2016-1-30_13-0-5-png.png
is it correct? I'm not sure!
but what I do after that?

That's obviously not right. If you're stuck with an infinite sum, try a simple sum and see what happens. Try:
##\phi = A(\phi_0 + \frac{\phi_1}{3^4})##
 
upload_2016-1-30_14-35-2.png
and
upload_2016-1-30_14-40-12.png
for n = 0,1
= A^2(1+1/3^8 + 1/5^8 + 1/7^8 + ... )
then it is true that = A^2(1/(2n+1)^8) isn't it?
 

Attachments

  • upload_2016-1-30_14-34-18.png
    upload_2016-1-30_14-34-18.png
    367 bytes · Views: 421
  • upload_2016-1-30_14-35-29.png
    upload_2016-1-30_14-35-29.png
    318 bytes · Views: 417
  • upload_2016-1-30_14-36-2.png
    upload_2016-1-30_14-36-2.png
    233 bytes · Views: 405
  • upload_2016-1-30_14-36-6.png
    upload_2016-1-30_14-36-6.png
    233 bytes · Views: 431
  • upload_2016-1-30_14-36-19.png
    upload_2016-1-30_14-36-19.png
    233 bytes · Views: 424
  • upload_2016-1-30_14-38-1.png
    upload_2016-1-30_14-38-1.png
    529 bytes · Views: 428
  • upload_2016-1-30_14-38-45.png
    upload_2016-1-30_14-38-45.png
    314 bytes · Views: 397
  • upload_2016-1-30_14-39-44.png
    upload_2016-1-30_14-39-44.png
    543 bytes · Views: 386
Was that integral sign in post #3 a typo?

For the next bit, trying googling "sums of reciprocal powers".
 
  • Like
Likes zahra95
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top