Can the value of pi be found through integration?

  • Thread starter Thread starter AndersHermansson
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integral
AndersHermansson
Messages
61
Reaction score
0
Is it possible to find an exact solution for this integral?

∫√(1-x*x)dx from 0 to 1

Is it possible to differentiate a root expression?

I found that:
pi = 4 * ∫√(1-x*x)dx from 0 to 1
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
the equation is for a semicircle of radius 1 from 0 to 1 you get a quarter circle and 1/4 pi *r^2=1/4pi

1/4pi is the answer
you could also evaluate the integral using a trig subsitution

you already found the answer if you divide both sides of the equation by 4 in your solution you also get the answer
 
Last edited:
for the trig sub

x=sin(θ)
dx=cos(θ)dθ
substitute into original integral simpligy trig expresion and switch limits of integration (evaluate interms of theta) and you will get &pi/4

if you haven't learned trig subs check it out in your calc book it not a very hard topic.
 
what is x*? is x a complex variable? i don t quite understand your integral
 
Probably because it's a lot easier than you're used to. :)
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top