Can the Work-Energy Theorem Determine Speed for Variable Acceleration?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the applicability of the Work-Energy Theorem in scenarios involving variable acceleration. It is confirmed that while the net work may remain the same for different distances, the 50m scenario cannot be analyzed using constant acceleration equations due to the presence of variable force. Participants clarify that the situation can still be assessed analytically by expressing the variable force as a function of position and integrating. The distinction between constant and variable acceleration is emphasized, highlighting the need for appropriate kinematic equations. The conversation concludes with the assertion that variable acceleration can be handled analytically despite the limitations of traditional methods.
PAstudent
Messages
47
Reaction score
0
image.jpg
1. Homework Statement

The Attempt at a Solution



I was wondering if I did something wrong for the 50m. I did the same process of finding the area under the line. I'm assuming it's possible to get the same speed since the net work is the same.[/B]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, it will be the same as for 20.
 
The 50m cannot be checked because it has a variable force from 20-50 and no longer a constant acceleration
 
PAstudent said:
The 50m cannot be checked because it has a variable force from 20-50 and no longer a constant acceleration
Not sure what you mean. Do you mean it cannot be checked analytically? It can. You would need to express the variable force as a function of x and integrate with respect to x to find the work done.
 
It says explain why Newton's second law and the constant acceleration kinematics equations cannot be used to check for the 50m
 
PAstudent said:
It says explain why Newton's second law and the constant acceleration kinematics equations cannot be used to check for the 50m
Yes, but that says using "constant acceleration" kinematics. As you say, it is not constant acceleration. But it can be checked analytically by using kinematics that cope with variable acceleration because the nature of that variation is known exactly.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top