Can Transverse Waves Exist in the Ocean Due to Hydrogen Bonding?

AI Thread Summary
Ocean waves exhibit both transverse and longitudinal characteristics, but transverse waves cannot propagate through liquids in general. However, surface transverse waves can occur due to gravity, with their amplitude decreasing with depth. In the bulk of the liquid, transverse waves are highly dissipative and do not propagate effectively due to significant attenuation. The discussion highlights that while water's hydrogen bonding may influence wave behavior, it does not enable sustained transverse wave propagation in the liquid's volume. Overall, the existence of transverse waves in oceans is primarily limited to surface phenomena.
pinguthepengu
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi, a search on google will reveal that an ocean wave is both transverse, and longitudinal. Another search will also reveal that a transverse wave cannot propagate through a liquid.
One of these statements is not quite right, is it that water is a special case liquid that can propagate tranverse waves because of hydrogen bonding?

thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There are surface transverse waves (due to gravity). Their amplitude A(z) fades out with depth: A(z)=A(0)e-z/L.

In a volume the transverse (due to viscosity) waves are highly dissipative - formally their wave vector has a huge imaginary part so they do not propagate too far. One even does not speak of transverse waves in volume.
 
Last edited:
Thanks for explaining bob.
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
I passed a motorcycle on the highway going the opposite direction. I know I was doing 125/km/h. I estimated that the frequency of his motor dropped by an entire octave, so that's a doubling of the wavelength. My intuition is telling me that's extremely unlikely. I can't actually calculate how fast he was going with just that information, can I? It seems to me, I have to know the absolute frequency of one of those tones, either shifted up or down or unshifted, yes? I tried to mimic the...

Similar threads

Back
Top