Can we see real, inverted and magnified images without a screen?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jaumzaum
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Images Screen
AI Thread Summary
Creating a real, inverted, and magnified image using a convergent lens results in a blurred view when observed from the opposite side, as the human eye cannot focus on rays that are already converging. The crystalline lens of the eye has limitations in bending light, which means it cannot converge images that require a focus smaller than its minimum capability. While there are configurations where real magnified images can be seen clearly, the specific setup discussed leads to blurriness due to the eye's inability to adjust for such images. A similar scenario with concave mirrors shows that the eye also struggles to focus on images formed behind it. Overall, the discussion emphasizes the optical limitations of the human eye in perceiving images formed in unconventional positions.
jaumzaum
Messages
433
Reaction score
33
I was wondering, if I put an object in the left, a convergent lens in the middle, in such a way that I create a real, inverted and magnified image in the right, and I observe the lens from the right side, in such a way that the image is formed behind me, how would it appear to me? I cannot imagine how can we see something that is behind ourselves. Do anyone have a picture of this?
 
Last edited:
Science news on Phys.org
It will simply look out of focus.

Check out
 
jaumzaum said:
I was wondering, if I put an object in the left, a convergent lens in the middle, in such a way that I create a real, inverted and magnified image in the right, and I observe the lens from the right side, in such a way that the image is formed behind me, how would it appear to me? I cannot imagine how can we see something that is behind ourselves. Do anyone have a picture of this?

Don't forget that your eye has a lens in it- you can't pretend to put your eye where a screen is and expect to 'see' what is on the screen.
 
1606226489219.png


From your video this is the real-inverted-magnified image. It's blur.

Consider my explanation. Our crystalline can bend to a maximum, when they acquire a minimum focus, say f1. They cannot bend more thanthat. The image above needed a focus smaller than f1 to be converged in our retina, that's why it's blur.

That explanation is not the same to say that "all real magnified images needs to be blur", because it can be tat, in a different configuration (for example, a less magnified real image that needs a bigger crystalline focus to be converged in the retina) the crystalline could converge it.

Am I right? Are there real, magnified images formed by convergent lenses that are not blur?
 
jaumzaum said:
I cannot imagine how can we see something that is behind ourselves. Do anyone have a picture of this?
We had a similar question about concave mirrors, with the eye placed between mirror and real image, so it also receives already converging rays:

https://www.physicsforums.com/threa...d-in-front-of-it-and-not-behind.990974/page-3

Here the object is the face itself, at the same position as the eye, with the real image behind the head. And yes, the seen image will be blurry because our eye lens usually doesn't focus already converging rays on the retina. So it's not build/trained for that. You would need a thinner eye lens than for infinity focus: hyper infinity.

concave_mirror_500px-png.png
 
Last edited:
Back
Top