Can x=8sin2t+6cos2t be proven as S.H.M. using a second derivative?

AI Thread Summary
The equation x = 8sin(2t) + 6cos(2t) can be proven to undergo simple harmonic motion (S.H.M.) by taking its second derivative. The first derivative is dx/dt = 20cos(2t + tan^(-1)(3/4)), and the second derivative is d²x/dt² = -40sin(2t + tan^(-1)(3/4)). This shows that the motion is periodic and can be expressed in the form x = Csin(ωt + φ), confirming it is S.H.M. The coefficients of sine and cosine yield the same angular frequency, ω² = 4, which is crucial for establishing S.H.M. Thus, the original equation meets the criteria for simple harmonic motion.
Cpt Qwark
Messages
45
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Prove that:
x=8sin2t+6cos2t is undergoing S.H.M.
(Not too sure about how to prove for solution.)

Homework Equations


Solution for S.H.M. x=asin(nt+α) is \frac{d^{2}x}{dy^{2}}=-n^2x

The Attempt at a Solution


r=\sqrt{8^{2}+6^{2}}=10\\α=tan^{-1}\frac{3}{4}\\∴x=10sin(2t+tan^{-1}\frac{3}{4})
Differentiating with respect to time: \frac{dx}{dt}=20cos(2t+tan^{-1}\frac{3}{4})\\\frac{d^{2}x}{dt^{2}}=-40sin(2t+tan^{-1}\frac{3}{4})
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Cpt Qwark said:
Solution for S.H.M. x=asin(nt+α) is \frac{d^{2}x}{dy^{2}}=-n^2x

...

∴x=10sin(2t+tan^{-1}\frac{3}{4})
Right. Adding any two sinusoidal functions of the same frequency will result in another sinusoidal function, regardless of their amplitudes.

If you solve the SHM differential equation, \frac{d^2x}{dt^2}=-kx you will get x=C_1\sin(\sqrt{k}t)+C_2\cos(\sqrt{k}t) and it because of the above fact that you can write the solution as x=C_3\sin(\sqrt{k}t+C_4)
 
Last edited:
Cpt Qwark said:

Homework Statement


Prove that:
x = 8sin2t+6cos2t is undergoing S.H.M.
You can just take this equation, compute x', then x'', and see that ω2 must = 4 by equating sine and cosine coefficients. Both yield the same answer ω2 = 4. Had the sine & cosine coeff. yielded differing ω then x(t) would not be shm.
 
Take the second derivative of the given expression and express it in terms of x. The result would eliminate sin and cos and will prove your answer in form of a=-nx.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top