Can you get the inertia from the angular speed?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the relationship between angular speed and moment of inertia, particularly in the context of a skater's spinning motion. It highlights that as a skater pulls their arms in, their moment of inertia decreases, leading to an increase in angular speed, which is a manifestation of the conservation of angular momentum. Participants clarify that angular speed and angular velocity can be considered equivalent in this scenario. The importance of calculating angular momentum (L) is emphasized, as it remains constant during the skater's motion. The conversation concludes with a reminder to include units in calculations for accuracy.
Ys VL
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


0HRqL84.jpg


Homework Equations


...

The Attempt at a Solution


I've been searching for the relation between the spinning speed and inertia in equation form. I do know that since the skater inertia is smaller the spinning speed is faster but that about it. Any hint would be helpful. One more thing, is angular velocity and angular speed the same thing?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ys VL said:

Homework Statement


0HRqL84.jpg


Homework Equations


...

The Attempt at a Solution

[/B]
I've been searching for the relation between the spinning speed and inertia in equation form. I do know that since the skater inertia is smaller the spinning speed is faster but that about it. Any hint would be helpful. One more thing, is angular velocity and angular speed the same thing?
Welcome to the PF.

The textbook that you took a picture of should have the relevant equations. Since the skater is spinning only about the vertical axis, the angular speed and the vector angular velocity can be considered to be the same.

What quantity is conserved as the skater pulls her arms in? What is the equation relating that conserved quantity to the moment of inertia (MOI) and her angular speed?
 
I'm sorry but my teacher made this up and handed us a to do list. I have no idea where he got it from but I must solve it. To answer directly all I have to work with is what is given in this sentence, the rest is from my knowledge of the class notes.
 
Last edited:
Ys VL said:
I'm sorry but my teacher made this up and handed us a to do list. I have no idea where he got it from but I must solve it. To answer directly all I have to work with is what is given in this sentence, the rest is from my knowledge of the class notes.
Do your notes have anything on angular momentum? If not, try g**gling it.
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman
I'm back,

I looked up angular momentum. From what I can tell if I calculate L (angular momentum) I should have no problem solving this since L is suppose to be constant and the tangential velocity is given for it's final and initial. I tried it and I think I finally got it. If this is right thanks haruspex, if not... what else do you think I should look up?

bidrbbk.jpg


Did I do it correctly?
 
Last edited:
Ys VL said:
I'm back,

I looked up angular momentum. From what I can tell if I calculate L (angular momentum) I should have no problem solving this since L is suppose to be constant and the tangential velocity is given for it's final and initial. I tried it and I think I finally got it. If this is right thanks haruspex, if not... what else do you think I should look up?

bidrbbk.jpg


Did I do it correctly?
Looks right - but you should always include the units in the answer, or better still at every step in the calculation.
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top