Can You Help Prove These Mathematical Identities?

  • Thread starter Thread starter guysensei1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Couple
guysensei1
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
Basically, I was messing with my calculator,
and i thought of this:

sqrt(x^sqrt(x^sqrt(x^...)))=sqrt(x)^sqrt(x)^sqrt(x)^...

where they go infinitely.
I can't prove it, so I need help.

another thing is 1/(a)+1/(a^2)+1/(a^3)... = 1/(a-1)

Perhaps the proof is something really obvious I missed?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not sure about the first off the top of my head, but I'll help with the second:

What you have here is a geometric series: 1 + r + r^{2} + \cdots + r^{n} with r = 1/a

Notice that you don't have the 1, so denoting the sum as S, and since (1 + r + r^{2} + \cdots + r^{n})(1-r) = 1 - r^{n+1}

S+1 = \lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} \frac{1 - r^{n+1}}{1-r}

This reduces to:

S+1 = \frac{a}{a-1} \Rightarrow S = \frac{a}{a-1} - \frac{a-1}{a-1} = \frac{1}{a-1}

Edit: typo
 
Actually I think the first one is deceptively simply. You know that (x^{m})^{n}= x^{mn}, so think of the square roots simply as \frac{1}{2} exponents.

For a finite example: [x^{x^{1/2}}]^{1/2} = x^{(1/2)x^{1/2}} = (x^{1/2})^{x^{1/2}}

Of course, this logic carries for an infinite number of exponents as well.
 
Last edited:
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
Back
Top