Can You Solve the Keplerian Two-Body Problem in Physics?

GaleForce
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Alright I'm really stuck on this question. I was wondering if anyone could help:

(a) Show that the total energy (per unit mass) of a particle orbiting in an attractive Keplerian potential V(r) = -GM/r is

E = (1/2)(dr/dt)^2 + (1/2)(J^2/r^2)-(GM)/r

where J = |r x v| is the particle's angular momentum (per unit mass).

(b) If the particle in part (a) has J =\= 0 and finite energy, is it possible for the particle to reach r = 0? Can the particle reach r = infinity if E < 0? If E > 0? If may help to sketch a graph of 1/2(dr/dt)^2 as a function of r for both E < 0 and E > 0. I have no idea how to even approach the problem. It really doesn't fit in with the rest of the work we've been doing so I'm completely clueless. Thanks if anyone can help out.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
a) dr/dt is only the radial part of the velocity vector \vec v. Since -GM/r is the potential energy (per unit mass), (1/2)(J^2/r^2) must be the contribution of the tangential component of the velocity to the kinetic energy p.u.m. \frac{1}{2}\vec v\cdot \vec v.

So the first thing to do is to separate the vector \vec r,\vec v into their radial and tangential components.

b) What are your thoughts on this one? What can you say if r=0?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top