Cannot make any sense out of this one

  • Thread starter Thread starter AudioFlux
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The problem involves determining the potential of a single large drop formed by combining 27 identical charged mercury drops, each at 10 volts. Each drop can be treated as a conducting sphere, allowing the use of Gauss's Law to calculate potential in terms of charge and radius. When combined, the total charge of the drops remains the same, but the radius of the new drop can be calculated to find the new potential. The discussion emphasizes the need to apply these principles to arrive at the solution. Understanding the relationship between charge, radius, and potential is crucial for solving this problem.
AudioFlux
Messages
58
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


"27 identical mercury drops are charged simultaneously to the same potential of 10 volt. What will be the potential if all the charged drops are made to combine to form one large drop? Assume all drops to be spherical."2. The attempt at a solution
To be quite honest, I cannot make any sense out of the question.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Each mercury drop can be assumed to be a conducting sphere(because it's a metal) and you can find their potential in terms of Q and r with the help of Gauss Law. Now, when these 27 drops are combined, the final radius R can be found, and the total charge, thereby giving you the potential of the bigger drop.
 
Infinitum said:
Each mercury drop can be assumed to be a conducting sphere(because it's a metal) and you can find their potential in terms of Q and r with the help of Gauss Law. Now, when these 27 drops are combined, the final radius R can be found, and the total charge, thereby giving you the potential of the bigger drop.

thank you, that was helpful :)
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top