Capacitor and Mechanics question, IPhO 2004

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a theoretical physics problem related to capacitors and mechanics from the IPhO 2004. Participants identify issues with the threshold voltage calculation, noting that the electric field affecting the disk is solely from the upper plate, not the lower. There are concerns about the algebraic manipulation leading to a missing factor in the final answer, specifically regarding the accelerations used in the calculations. One participant suggests that considering velocities instead of just speed might be necessary for accuracy. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly applying physics principles and algebraic accuracy in problem-solving.
Mantaray
Messages
17
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



It's theoretical question 1 d) I'm having problems with, I'm at a loss as to where I have gone wrong with my approach? The question has been attached.

Homework Equations



see attachment please

The Attempt at a Solution



see attachment please.

It's quite a lengthy problem I suppose, so a hearty thanks to whoever takes the time to take a look!
 

Attachments

Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
1/ The threshold voltage is wrong. Hint: the E-field that exerts force on the disk is not V/d. Here we also need to reason a bit :smile:
2/ Have you tried computing it to the final answer? Let me rewrite your final equation as:
v_s^2(1-\eta ^2)(1+\eta ^2)=2d\eta ^2(\eta ^2a_1+a_2)
Oops, what happened to \eta ^4? Where is it? :biggrin:
 
1/ The threshold voltage is indeed wrong, I was thinking that the lower plate would exert a force upwards on the disc, but it does not since there is no electric field under the small plate. Therefore only the field of the upper plate exerts a force on the disc.

2/ I'll be thinking about that for some longer... I maybe should've taken into account the velocities instead of the plain speed, or does it work out? The solutions should be somewhere on the web too, but that would be cheating.
 
Hmm I was able to work your formula out to the final answer provided in the solution manual, but I lost a factor two in my accelerations. I used the force exerted on the disc by the electric field, which is \chiV^{2}/(2dm). Then if I input a_{1} = \chiV^{2}/(2dm) - g and a_{2} = -\chiV^{2}/(2dm) -g, I'm a factor two short in \chi V^{2}/m in the final answer. Or have I just made another mistake in my algebra?
 
Maybe I would be more helpful if I can see your full work :smile: Sorry, I'm lazy :biggrin:
Anyway, I guess there should be something wrong with the algebra.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top