Drakkith said:the voltage drop across it is zero, leading to zero voltage drop across the capacitor as well.
CWatters said:A "short circuit" exists between two points when something (eg a wire) having relatively low resistance is connected between those two points. That's what you have in your circuit...
ehild said:The "short circuit" is that short piece of wire that connects the plates of the capacitor. We say: "the capacitor is short circuited".
ehild
Hardik Batra said:Short piece of wire that connect the capacitor. But from where short wire comes to connects the capacitor.
Hardik Batra said:What will happened when we connected low resistance wire?
Hardik Batra said:Short piece of wire that connect the capacitor. But from where short wire comes to connects the capacitor.
Delta² said:Hm, viewing this problem from the point of view of classical physics i sense a contradiction... IF we accept that the rightmost loop has zero resistance, then by kirchhoffs law the current will become infinite there and the capacitor will be discharged in zero time. BUT we know that the electromagnetic field will propagate with limited speed even through a zero-resistance wire, the induced current wave will propagate also with a limited speed, hence there can be no discharge in zero time. What do u say?
Nugatory said:No contradiction, even in classical physics. This is just the difference between considering the steady state the system settles into when the voltages stabilizes (capacitor fully discharged, and stays that way) and the short-lived period during which the voltages are still changing. The latter case cannot be correctly analyzed in terms of ideal wires with zero resistance - no matter how small the resistance of the wire is, you have to take it into account when calculating the discharge time of the capacitor.