Capacitor: surface charge densities

unscientific
Messages
1,728
Reaction score
13

Homework Statement



Given a capacitor, top plate with charge 2Q, bottom plate -Q: Find surface charge densities of all four surfaces and E-fields everywhere.

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



34eaqkx.png


I start off with the general case of top plate having charge Q1, bottom plate Q2. Inner surfaces of capacitor get their charge densities distorted more. (Zero distortion when plates are very far away; equal charge distributed on inner and outer surfaces)

Inner and outer top surfaces charge density distorted by sigma, while bottom inner and outer surfaces distorted by gamma\sigma_1 = \frac{Q_1}{2A} - \delta, E_1 = \frac{1}{2\epsilon_0}(\frac{Q_1}{2A} - \delta)
\sigma_2 = \frac{Q_1}{2A} + \delta, E_2 = \frac{1}{2\epsilon_0}(\frac{Q1}{2A} + \delta)
\sigma_3 = -\frac{Q_2}{2A} - \gamma, E_3 = \frac{1}{2\epsilon_0}(-\frac{Q2}{2A} - \gamma)
\sigma_4 = -\frac{Q_2}{2A} + \gamma, E_4 = \frac{1}{2\epsilon_0}(-\frac{Q2}{2A} + \gamma)

Electric fields at regions

E_A = -E_1 - E_2 + E_3 + E_4 = \frac {1}{2\epsilon_0}(-\frac{Q_1}{A}-\frac{Q_2}{A})
E_B = E_1 - E_2 + E_3 + E_4 = \frac{1}{2\epsilon_0}(-2\delta -\frac{Q_2}{A}) = 0
E_C = E_1 + E_2 + E_3 + E_4 = \frac{1}{2\epsilon_0}(\frac{Q_1}{A}-\frac{Q_2}{A})
E_D = E_1 + E_2 -E_3 + E_4 = \frac{1}{2\epsilon_0}(\frac{Q_1}{A} + 2\gamma) = 0
E_E = E_1 + E_2 - E_3 - E_4 = \frac{1}{2\epsilon_0}(\frac{Q_1}{A} + \frac{Q_2}{A})

Answers
\sigma_1 = \frac{Q}{2A}, E_1 = \frac{Q}{4A\epsilon_0}
\sigma_2 = \frac{3Q}{2A}, E_2 = \frac{3Q}{4A\epsilon_0}
\sigma_3 = \frac{3Q}{2A}, E_3 = \frac{3Q}{4A\epsilon_0}
\sigma_4 = \frac{-Q}{2A}, E_4 = \frac{-Q}{4A\epsilon_0}

These answers are wrong, as the inner plates should have equal but opposite charge densities, the outer plates will have exactly same charge densities. I checked similar questions online.

I'm guesssing the charge densities should be (from top to bottom surfaces): +1/2, +3/2, -3/2, +1/2.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
unscientific said:

Homework Statement



Given a capacitor, top plate with charge 2Q, bottom plate -Q: Find surface charge densities of all four surfaces and E-fields everywhere.I'm guesssing the charge densities should be (from top to bottom surfaces): +1/2, +3/2, -3/2, +1/2.

Your guess is correct, but I can not follow your derivation. The electric field of a surface charge on a metal surface is σ/ε0 outward, not the half.

Imagine you have 2Q charge arranged evenly along a plane at the position of the upper plate of the capacitor, and -Q charge along a plane at he position of the bottom plate. Determine the electric field above the planes, between them and below.

If you know the electric fields you can place the plates of the capacitor back. You know that the surface charge density on a metal surface is equal to ε0E. Knowing E, you can determine the surface charge densities at both sides of both capacitor plates.
 
ehild said:
Your guess is correct, but I can not follow your derivation. The electric field of a surface charge on a metal surface is σ/ε0 outward, not the half.

Imagine you have 2Q charge arranged evenly along a plane at the position of the upper plate of the capacitor, and -Q charge along a plane at he position of the bottom plate. Determine the electric field above the planes, between them and below.

If you know the electric fields you can place the plates of the capacitor back. You know that the surface charge density on a metal surface is equal to ε0E. Knowing E, you can determine the surface charge densities at both sides of both capacitor plates.

I tried that, didn't work:

Gauss's Law on inner plates:
\frac{\sigma_2}{2\epsilon_0} = \frac{-\sigma_3}{2\epsilon_0}

Conservation of Charge on plates:
A(\sigma_1 + \sigma_2) = 2Q
A(\sigma_3 + \sigma_4) = -QI only end up with 3 equations..
 
Last edited:
ehild said:
Your guess is correct, but I can not follow your derivation. The electric field of a surface charge on a metal surface is σ/ε0 outward, not the half.

Imagine you have 2Q charge arranged evenly along a plane at the position of the upper plate of the capacitor, and -Q charge along a plane at he position of the bottom plate. Determine the electric field above the planes, between them and below.

If you know the electric fields you can place the plates of the capacitor back. You know that the surface charge density on a metal surface is equal to ε0E. Knowing E, you can determine the surface charge densities at both sides of both capacitor plates.

I have come up with another equation, by trial and error -- Consider the field inside the top plate = 0

Case 1: top outer surface (-), bottom outer surface (+)
\sigma_1 - \sigma_2 - \sigma_3 -\sigma_4 = 0

Case 2: top outer surface (+), bottom outer surface (-)
\sigma_1 - \sigma_2 - \sigma_3 -\sigma_4 = 0

Case 3: top outer surface (+), bottom outer surface (+)
\sigma_1 - \sigma_2 - \sigma_3 -\sigma_4 = 0

Case 4: top outer surface (-), bottom outer surface (-)
\sigma_1 - \sigma_2 - \sigma_3 -\sigma_4 = 0

They all give the same relation. This equation with the three above, we can solve for them.
 
Try to work with the field lines. Every positive charge q is the source of q/ε0 field lines, and every negative, -q charge is the sink of q/ε0 field lines.

Imagine two planar arrangement of charges, 2Q on the upper plane and -Q on the bottom plane. Apply the method of superposition. Both planes contribute to the field in every domain A, B ,C and the net field is the sum of these contributions.
You have 2Q/ε0 field lines, emerging from the upper plane symmetrically at both sides of the plane, both upward and downward. Take upward positive. The downward field lines penetrate to both B and C. So the upper plane contributes to the electric field in domain A with Q/(Aε0) , and with -Q/(Aε0) between the planes (B) and also in domain C.
The other, negative plane of charges contributes to the field with Q/(2Aε0) in domain C, and with -Q/(2Aε0) in both B and A.

Adding these contributions, you get:

EA=Q/(Aε0)-Q/(2Aε0)=1/2 Q/(Aε0)

EB=-Q/(Aε0)-Q/(2Aε0)=-3/2 Q/(Aε0)

EC...

Can you proceed?

Now you place the metal plates in the position of the planes - it does not change the fields in A, B, C. The magnitude of the surface charge density is |E|ε0 on each surfaces.

ehild
 

Attachments

  • fieldlines.JPG
    fieldlines.JPG
    12.7 KB · Views: 667
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes 1 person
ehild said:
Try to work with the field lines. Every positive charge q is the source of q/ε0 field lines, and every negative, -q charge is the sink of q/ε0 field lines.

Imagine two planar arrangement of charges, 2Q on the upper plane and -Q on the bottom plane. Apply the method of superposition. Both planes contribute to the field in every domain A, B ,C and the net field is the sum of these contributions.
You have 2Q/ε0 field lines, emerging from the upper plane symmetrically at both sides of the plane, both upward and downward. Take upward positive. The downward field lines penetrate to both B and C. So the upper plane contributes to the electric field in domain A with Q/(Aε0) , and with -Q/(Aε0) between the planes (B) and also in domain C.
The other, negative plane of charges contributes to the field with Q/(2Aε0) in domain C, and with -Q/(2Aε0) in both B and A.

Adding these contributions, you get:

EA=Q/(Aε0)-Q/(2Aε0)=1/2 Q/(Aε0)

EB=-Q/(Aε0)-Q/(2Aε0)=-3/2 Q/(Aε0)

EC...

Can you proceed?

Now you place the metal plates in the position of the planes - it does not change the fields in A, B, C. The magnitude of the surface charge density is |E|ε0 on each surfaces.

ehild

I have solved it using the four equations above, thank you very much for your help too!
 
Hello everyone, I’m considering a point charge q that oscillates harmonically about the origin along the z-axis, e.g. $$z_{q}(t)= A\sin(wt)$$ In a strongly simplified / quasi-instantaneous approximation I ignore retardation and take the electric field at the position ##r=(x,y,z)## simply to be the “Coulomb field at the charge’s instantaneous position”: $$E(r,t)=\frac{q}{4\pi\varepsilon_{0}}\frac{r-r_{q}(t)}{||r-r_{q}(t)||^{3}}$$ with $$r_{q}(t)=(0,0,z_{q}(t))$$ (I’m aware this isn’t...
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
Back
Top