Capacitors Homework Help: Solving Ideas for Initial Charge and Kirchoff's Laws

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving a capacitor circuit problem involving initial charge and Kirchhoff's laws. Participants express uncertainty about applying charge conservation principles and Kirchhoff's equations after a switch is closed. It is noted that the charge between capacitors C1 and C2 remains constant, leading to the equation V1C1 + V2C2 = v1'C1 + V2'C2. There is also consideration of whether the same approach applies to capacitors C2 and C3, with the total charge of the circuit being a key point of confusion. Overall, the consensus is that Kirchhoff's laws can be utilized to analyze the circuit effectively.
villampaxo
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
any ideas on solving this? (the capacitors are initially charged) I have some ideas but `im not sure which one is correct... I know that Q remains the same between C1 and C2, so that V1C1 + V2C2 = v1'C1 + V2'C2. From there, i don`t know if i can do the same thing for capacitors C2 and C3. I can use Kirchoff for the whole circuit... Is the total charge before and after the switch is closed maintened so that i can use: V1C1 + V2C2 + V3C3= v1'C1 + V2'C2 + V3'C2 ? (Vx' after the switch is closed, Vx before)
 

Attachments

  • capac.jpg
    capac.jpg
    13.7 KB · Views: 524
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I`d appreciate a quick reply `cause I have exams coming up...
 
The net charge of the whole circuit seems to be zero. So I'm not sure that whether you can you use it or not. But I don't have any idea either.
 
Last edited:
I think the answer is: that the charge between C1 and C2 is the same before and after the switch is closed, and the total charge of the circuit remains the same so: C1V1 + C2V2= C1V'1+ C2V'2 and also, the total charge of the circuit remains the same so you ve got two equations. I think that kirchhoff can be used too.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top