Caption: Understanding Lensing Mass and Velocity in Particle Astrophysics

  • Thread starter Thread starter FatPhysicsBoy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Geometry
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding the geometric relationships in lensing mass and velocity in particle astrophysics, specifically referencing equations from D H Perkins' textbook. The key point is the use of right triangles to relate distances and angles, with LS' and AS' being derived from small angle approximations in a large distance context. Participants highlight that for small angles, the sine of the angle approximates the angle itself in radians, which simplifies the calculations. The Pythagorean theorem is also noted as essential for connecting these geometric relationships. Overall, the thread emphasizes the importance of geometry and trigonometry in astrophysical lensing scenarios.
FatPhysicsBoy
Messages
62
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I just came across a couple of expressions in a textbook I don't particularly understand.

keuc5h.png
Caption: "A point lensing mass L moving with velocity v perpendicular to the line of sight. O is the observer and S' is the projected position of the source in the plane of the lens.

The textbook is D H Perkins - Particle Astrophysics 2nd edition, Pg 163.

Homework Equations



An excerpt from the textbook is ".. the right-angled triangle AS'L gives us LS'^{2} = AS'^{2} + AL^{2}, where LS' = D_{L}\theta_{s}, AS' = D_{L}\theta_{s}(min) .."

The Attempt at a Solution



Tried to refresh geometry/trig, looked at sine and cosine rules and different combinations of lines and angles. I still don't understand the last two equations, how does multiplying by the angle give you LS' and AS'? Looks simple but why you can do it escapes me..
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Small angles in radian measure approximate their sin() value and that maybe that's what's going on here.
 
In an Astrophysical context, ##D_L## is probably assumed to be very large with respect to other dimensions, making the angles small (as stated by @jedishrfu) so that the sides AS' and LS' are essentially equal to the arc lengths subtended by ##D_L## swept out by those angles. The rest is Pythagoras.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top