Capturing an Asteroid: Creating Earth's 2nd Moon

  • Thread starter Thread starter errorist
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Asteroid Moon
AI Thread Summary
Capturing an asteroid to create a second moon for Earth would require a significant deceleration force to adjust its velocity for stable orbit. Current technology is insufficient for the energy demands of placing an asteroid in orbit, as even diverting an asteroid on a collision course is near the limits of our capabilities. A rocket would need to rendezvous with the asteroid and provide the necessary delta-v, but existing systems are not integrated for such missions. The discussion highlights that while capturing and studying an asteroid is preferable to redirecting or destroying it, the feasibility remains a challenge. Overall, the concept of an additional moon raises intriguing possibilities, but practical implementation is far from achievable with current technology.
errorist
Messages
92
Reaction score
0
What would be the best way to capture this asteroind and place it in a orbit about the Earth? It would be better to capture and study it then to just redirect it or destroy it. Imagine Earth with two Moons.

http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/asteroid_update_041227.html
 
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
To capture the asteroid and 'park' it in orbit would require a decelerating force to bring its velocity down to that which would be compatible with an orbital velocity in Earth's gravity field.

This would require having a rocket rendezvous with the asteroid and then having sufficient reserve to provide the necessary \Delta V.
 
This thing is already hauling in the coal. What if it is already traveling near the speed needed to do this?
 
Last edited:
Astronuc,
Do you think we presently have the capability to direct an asteroid away from hitting earth, assuming we have sufficient time of course?
 
Actually I think it will be going slower than the Earth when the near miss occurs - not that that makes any difference. The amount of energy required to place it in Earth orbit is beyond our current technology.

Even diverting an asteroid that isn't due to hit for 24 years is on the limits of our technology, and to turn a 24 year distant hit into a near miss requires only the tiniest of nudges, compared with the massive shove required to get it into Earth orbit.
 
We have elements of system that could be used to deflect NEO 2004 MN4, but we do not have an integrated delivery or missions system. Right now it is not a significant issue within NASA. It might take in the range of 5 years to put a system together.

See also the related thread - https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=57882 - which discusses the likelihood of impact.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Turbocharging carbureted petrol 2 stroke engines'
Hi everyone, online I ve seen some images about 2 stroke carbureted turbo (motorcycle derivation engine). Now.. In the past in this forum some members spoke about turbocharging 2 stroke but not in sufficient detail. The intake and the exhaust are open at the same time and there are no valves like a 4 stroke. But if you search online you can find carbureted 2stroke turbo sled or the Am6 turbo. The question is: Is really possible turbocharge a 2 stroke carburated(NOT EFI)petrol engine and...
I need some assistance with calculating hp requirements for moving a load. - The 4000lb load is resting on ball bearing rails so friction is effectively zero and will be covered by my added power contingencies. Load: 4000lbs Distance to travel: 10 meters. Time to Travel: 7.5 seconds Need to accelerate the load from a stop to a nominal speed then decelerate coming to a stop. My power delivery method will be a gearmotor driving a gear rack. - I suspect the pinion gear to be about 3-4in in...
Back
Top